POOJA SWAMI,GWALIOR vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, GWALIOR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) failed to apply its mind or provide a reasoned order. Therefore, the matter was remitted back to the CIT(A) for a fresh adjudication on merits.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer initiated reassessment proceedings based on information about the assessee's high-value cryptocurrency trading. The AO added significant amounts for undisclosed capital gains and unexplained bank credits. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) properly adjudicated the assessee's appeal by providing a reasoned order. The adequacy of the CIT(A)'s analysis of the assessee's contentions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 144B,Section 250
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA (DB
Before: SUNIL KUMAR SINGH & BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH
PER: SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, J.M.
This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 29.06.2026 passed in appeal No NFAC/2017-18/10574876 by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax/NFAC (Delhi) [(hereinafter referred to as the “CIT(A)] u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) for the A.Y. 2018-19, wherein ld CIT(A), has dismissed assessee’s appeal.
Perusal of the records shows that the reassessment proceedings u/s 147 of the Act were initiated by the assessing officer on the basis of the information available with the department, that the assessee had undertaken high value trading in Crypto-Currency (Bitcoin) during the F.Y. 2017-18 relevant to A.Y. 2
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026