SMT SHARADA LR OF LATE MUTTEGERE JAVAREGOWDA APPAJJI,BHADRAVATHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1(4), BENGALURU, BENGALURU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The reasoning was based on the explicit submission made by the assessee's Authorized Representative, supported by a written request, indicating a clear intention to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. No other issues were decided, and no specific relief was granted beyond the dismissal of the appeal. The ratio decidendi is that an assessee has the right to withdraw an appeal filed before the Tribunal, provided a proper request is made.
What were the facts?
The assessee, SMT SHARADA LR OF LATE MUTTEGERE JAVAREGOWDA APPAJJI, filed an appeal against an order dated 17.09.2024, passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-11, Bengaluru, under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal pertains to the assessment year 2019-20. The revenue is represented by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle - 1(4), Bengaluru. During the hearing, the assessee's Authorized Representative informed the Tribunal that the assessee wished to withdraw the appeal and submitted a written request to that effect.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the assessee is entitled to withdraw the appeal filed before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal? (Question of law) Assessee's Contention: The assessee, through its Authorized Representative, submitted a written request to withdraw the present appeal. The Authorized Representative stated at the outset of the hearing that the assessee seeks to withdraw the appeal. Revenue's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific contentions from the revenue regarding the withdrawal of the appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCHES, BANGALORE
Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED & SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL
PER SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
The assessee has filed the present appeal against the impugned order dated 17.09.2024, passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-11, Bengaluru, [“learned CIT(A)”], for the assessment year 2019-20
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026