THE MEMBER FOR THE BOARD OF AGRICULTURAL INCOME-TAX, ASSAM vs. SMT. SINDHURANI CHAUDHURANI
What did the Supreme Court hold?
The Supreme Court held that 'salami' payments are not 'agricultural income' as defined in Section 2(a)(i) of the Assam Agricultural Income-Tax Act, 1939. The Court reasoned that the true indicia of salami are its single, non-recurring character and payment prior to the creation of the tenancy. It is the consideration paid by the tenant for being let into possession and is a capital receipt in the hands of the landlord, not rent or revenue. The Court distinguished several prior cases, including Kamakshya Narain Singh v. The Commissioner of Income Tax, which supported the view that salami is a capital receipt. The Court found that the salami payments in question were made by prospective lessees anterior to the constitution of the landlord-tenant relationship as the price for the lessor agreeing to part with his rights. Therefore, these payments had the characteristics of a capital payment and were not revenue. The appeals brought by the assessees were allowed, and the referred questions were answered in the negative. The appeal by the State of Assam was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The appeals concerned the character of payments termed 'Salami' and whether they constituted 'agricultural income' under the Assam Agricultural Income-Tax Act, 1939. In one case (C.A. No. 162 of 1955), the assessee was a co-sharer in a zamindari estate. The income from salami was Rs. 9,331-9-4, received from the settlement of 414 holdings, including virgin and auction-purchase lands. The Agricultural Income Tax Officer assessed this sum as agricultural income. In connected appeals (C.A. Nos. 38-44 of 1956), similar issues arose concerning payments received by zamindar assessees for granting agricultural leases. The dispute centered on whether these salami payments, made prior to tenancy creation and of a non-recurring character, were taxable as agricultural income.
What were the issues?
1. Whether single, non-recurring premia or 'salamis' paid to a landlord assessee as consideration for the settlement of agricultural land at the time of granting a lease can be held to be income within the meaning of the Assam Agricultural Income-Tax Act, 1939? (Question of law and fact, concerning Section 2(a)(i) of the Act). 2. Whether single, non-recurring premia or 'salamis' paid to a landlord assessee as consideration for the settlement of agricultural land, when such premia are not dependent on the rate of rent charged, can be held to be income within the meaning of the Act? (Question of law and fact, concerning Section 2(a)(i) of the Act). Assessee's contentions: The assessees argued that 'salami' payments were not rent or revenue, but a capital receipt. They relied on the definition of salami as a payment made prior to the creation of tenancy and its non-recurring nature. They cited Kamakshya Narain Singh v. The Commissioner of Income Tax (1943) L.R. 70 I.A. 180. Revenue's contentions: The revenue contended that these salami payments constituted 'agricultural income' and were taxable under the Act. The judgment does not explicitly record the revenue's specific arguments beyond this general assertion.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 2(a)(i)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 1019 We are of opinion that the principles bid down in Northern Aluminium Co., Ltd. v.
Inland Revenue Commissioners( 1 ) and fo!cmd Revenue Commissioners v. ··N orthem Aluminium Co., Ltd.( 2 ) are applicable to the decision of the present case, and that a contingent liability in respect of unexpired risk is not an "accruing liability" within r. 2 of Sch. II to the Act.
The decision appealed from is correct, and this appeal must accordingly be dismissed with costs.
Appeal dismissed. THE MEMBER FOR THE BOARD OF AGRICULTURAL INCOME-TAX, ASSAM v. SMT. SINDHURANI CHAUDHURANI (with connected appeals) (BHAGWATI, VENKATARAMA AYYAR and J. L. KAPUR J. L. KAPUR J J.)
Salami-lndicia--lf capital income-tax-Assam Agricultural 1939), s. 2(a) (i). rrceipt-Liability to agricultural Income-tax Act (Assam IX of The true indicia of salami are ( 1) its single. nonrecurring character and (2) payment prior to the cre.'.ltion of the tenancy.
It is the consideration paid by the tenant for being let into po'session and can be neither rent nor re\'enue but is a capital receipt in the hands of the landlord.
Kamakshya Narain Singh v. T
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
