THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MYSORE, TRAVANCORE-COCHIN AND COORG, BANGALORE vs. THE INDO MERCANTILE BANK, LIMILED

CIVIL APPEAL No. 259/1958Supreme Court1959 INSC 1623 February 1959Bench: 3 JudgesAuthor: NATWARLAL HARILAL BHAGWATI, BHUVNESHWAR PRASAD SINHA, J.L. KAPUR14 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What were the facts?

The assessees, companies with head offices in the erstwhile State of Cochin and branches in Travancore and elsewhere, sought to set off losses incurred outside Travancore against profits made within Travancore for income-tax assessment under the Travancore Income-tax Act. The Income-tax Officer disallowed this deduction, relying on the first proviso to Section 32(1) of the Travancore Income-tax Act, which corresponds to the first proviso to Section 24(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The assessees contended that their business was a single, indivisible unit for tax purposes and they were entitled to the deduction. The appeals before the Supreme Court concerned the Commissioner of Income-tax challenging the High Court's decision in favour of the assessees.

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Supreme Court held that the first proviso to Section 32(1) of the Travancore Income-tax Act (corresponding to Section 24(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922) bars the set-off only when a loss arises under one head and the income against which it is sought to be set off arises under a different head. In cases where profits and losses arise under the same head, they are to be adjusted under Sections 7 to 12B of the Indian Act. The Court reasoned that a proviso carves out an exception and operates in the same field as the main enactment. The language of the proviso did not necessitate restricting the set-off to business alone or modifying the computation under Section 10. The word 'business' in Section 10 of the Indian Act is not confined to business in British India, given the definitions of 'total income' and 'total world income' and the chargeability provisions. Therefore, the assessees were entitled to set off losses incurred outside Travancore against profits made within Travancore. The appeals were dismissed.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, under Section 32(1) of the Travancore Income-tax Act (corresponding to Section 24(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922), losses incurred outside the State of Travancore can be set off against profits made within the State of Travancore, considering the first proviso to Section 32(1). Assessee's contentions: - The business is one and indivisible for tax assessment purposes, entitling them to deduct losses incurred outside Travancore from profits made within Travancore. Revenue's contentions: - Under the first proviso to Section 32(1) of the Travancore Income-tax Act, losses incurred outside Travancore cannot be set off against profits made in Travancore. - The proviso affects the main enactment by disallowing deduction of losses incurred outside the State from profits made within the State. - The proviso applies only to the 'business' head, as it refers to 'loss of profits or gains' and not 'income'. - The term 'business' in Section 13 of the Travancore Act (corresponding to Section 10 of the Indian Act) refers only to business within Travancore State, as prior to 1939, income was only chargeable if received or accrued within the respective territories.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 32(1),Section 24(1),Section 9,Section 6,Section 18,Section 14,Section 13,Section 10,Section 3,Section 4,Section 7,Section 12B

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

I959 February 23. 256 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1959] Supp. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MYSORE, TRAV ANCORE-COCHIN AND COORO, BANGALORE v. THE INDO MERCANTILE BANK, Lli\H'l'ED (and connected appeal) (N. H. BrrAGWATI, B. P. SINHA and J. L. KAPUR, JJ.)

Inconie Tax-Business Loss-Set off-Profits niade in Travan- corc State-Losses inc1'rrcd o1'tside the Statc--Scopc of tile proviso to the 111ain cnactn1e1it-Travancore Inco1ne-tax Act, II2I (Travancorc XXIII of II2I), SS. 4, 9, IJ, I8, 32(I), first proviso-Indian Income-tax Act, I922 (XI of I922), ss. 3, 4, 6, IO, I4, 24(I), first proviso.

Section 32(1) of the Travancore Income-tax Act, which corres- ponds to s. 24(1) of the lndian Income-tax Act, 1922, provided : "Where any assessee sustains a loss of profits or gains in any year under any of the heads mentioned in Section 9 [s. 6 of the Indian Act] he shall be entitled to have the amount of loss set off against this income, profits or gains under any other head in that year: Provided that where the loss sustained is a loss of profits or gains which 'vould but for the loss have accrued or arisen \vithin British India or in an Indian State and would under the pr

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 32(1)

All 376 judgments and leading authorities on Section 32(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →