THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY vs. S. K. F. BALL BEARING CO., LTD.

CIVIL APPEAL No. 9/1958Supreme Court[1961] 1 S.C.R. 14110 August 1960Bench: 3 JudgesAuthor: S.K. DAS, M. HIDAYATULLAH, J.C. SHAH S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS8 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What were the facts?

The assessee, S. K. F. Ball Bearing Co. Ltd. (S.K.F.), acted as the sole selling agent in India for Swedish and Panamanian companies (foreign corporations) manufacturing ball bearing equipment. The agreement stipulated that S.K.F. would pay the net sales value to the foreign corporations within 30 days of the last day of the month of sale, after deducting commission and import expenses. During assessment years 1948-49 to 1951-52, S.K.F. remitted sale proceeds to the foreign corporations. In most cases, remittances were made after goods were sold but before the buyers paid. In some instances, remittances were made before sale, and in others, after buyer payment. The Income-tax Officer assessed the foreign corporations under Section 4(1)(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, on profits included in the price realized by S.K.F., without distinguishing between remittances made before or after buyer payment. Higher authorities confirmed this. The High Court, on reference, held that tax was payable only on remittances made after sale proceeds were recovered from buyers.

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Supreme Court held that the liability to pay income-tax under Section 4(1)(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, arises on the receipt of income, and the place where the price is received is determinative of whether the income is received in the taxable territory. The Court found that S.K.F., acting as an agent for the foreign corporations, received the price of goods sold within the taxable territory. The fact that S.K.F. made remittances to the foreign corporations before realizing the price from the buyers did not alter the nature of the realization. These remittances were considered amounts due by S.K.F. under its contractual obligation (Clause 23 of the agreement), not the sale proceeds themselves. The income embedded in the sale proceeds was deemed to be received by the foreign corporations within the taxable territory when the price was realized by S.K.F. Therefore, the profit realized by S.K.F. in the taxable territory on behalf of the foreign corporations was liable to tax under Section 4(1)(a), irrespective of whether the remittances were made before or after the price was received from the buyers. The appeal was allowed to this extent.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the liability to pay income-tax under Section 4(1)(a) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, arises on the receipt of income, and if so, is the place where the price is received determinative of whether the income is received in the taxable territory? Assessee's contention (as per High Court's finding): Tax is payable only on remittances made after the sale proceeds were recovered from the buyers. The High Court held that the foreign corporations had a business connection in India, but S.K.F. was liable to pay tax only on remittances made after the sale proceeds were realized. Revenue's contention (as per the Supreme Court's analysis): The Income-tax Officer assessed tax on profits included in the price realized by S.K.F. without distinguishing between remittances made before or after recovery of sale proceeds. The Supreme Court's judgment implies the revenue argued for taxability on all remittances made on behalf of the foreign corporations, irrespective of the timing of buyer payment.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 4(1)(a),Section 43

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

- - 1 S.C.R. SUPREME COURT REPORTS 141 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY v. S. K. F. BALL BEARING CO., LTD. (S. K. ,DAS, M. HIDAYATULLAH anq 'J. C. SHAH, JJ.)

Income-tax-Agent selling goods manufactured by principal- Remittances of sale proceeds made to the principal before and after the recovery of price of goods-Profits-Whether include' remittances made before recovery of price by the Agent-The Indian Income-tax Act, r922'(II of r922), s. 4(r){a). . A Swedish company manufacturing ball bearing equipment entered into an agreement with the respondent, S. K. F. Ball Bearing Co. Ltd. registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, appointing the latter as its sole selling agent in India.

The material portion of the Agreement ran thus:- - · "Clause 23 :- _ The Agent shall pay to S. K. F. net sales value of the said products that are sold each month, after deduc- tion of the Commission that has been agreed upon and the import expenses that' have been paid: Payment shall be made in Sweden thirty days at the latest following the last day of the month in which the sales have been effected."

During the second world war a corporation known as the Pan- rope Corpo

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 4(1)(a)

All 47 judgments and leading authorities on Section 4(1)(a) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →