K. M. S. REDDY, COMMISSIONER OF INCOME. TAX, KERALA (COIMBATORE), ERNAKULAM vs. THE WEST COAST CHEMICALS AND INDUSTRIES LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION), ALLEPPY

CIVIL APPEAL No. 286/1961Supreme Court1962 INSC 10320 March 1962Bench: 3 JudgesAuthor: S.K. DAS, M. HIDAYATULLAH, J.C. SHAH14 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Tribunal held that the sale of chemicals and raw materials was a winding-up sale, not a sale in the course of business operations. Although the second agreement included chemicals and paper, and a higher price was paid, the transaction was still considered a winding-up sale. There was no evidence that the company had previously sold chemicals as part of its regular business; the two instances cited were too small to demonstrate continued or sustained trading in chemicals. The clause in the Memorandum of Association allowing the sale of chemicals was not utilized in a manner indicative of trading. The Tribunal concluded that a winding-up sale is not 'trading or doing business,' and therefore, the sum of Rs. 1,15,259 was not liable to tax. The appeal was dismissed.

What were the facts?

The assessee, The West Coast Chemicals and Industries Ltd. (in liquidation), was incorporated in 1937 primarily to acquire and work a match factory. Its Memorandum of Association also empowered it to manufacture and deal in chemicals. The company manufactured matches until April 1941, after which profits declined. On May 9, 1943, it agreed to sell its match factory assets for Rs. 5,75,000, excluding manufactured goods and chemicals. A subsequent agreement on August 9, 1943, for Rs. 7,35,000 included chemicals and paper for manufacture. The Directors' report stated a capital appreciation and substantial profit from the sale of chemicals. Income-tax authorities sought to tax a profit of Rs. 2,00,000 (later reduced to Rs. 1,15,259) arising from the sale of chemicals and raw materials, contending it was business income. The assessee argued it was a realization sale after winding up, not ordinary trading.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the profit arising from the sale of chemicals and other raw materials, sold during the winding up of the company, is liable to income-tax as business profit, considering the company's Memorandum of Association permitted dealing in chemicals and the sale occurred after the match manufacturing business ceased. (Section 25 of the Travancore Income-tax Act) Assessee's Contentions: - The stock of raw materials was sold in a realization sale after the company had been wound up, not in the course of ordinary trading. - The clause in the Memorandum of Association empowering the company to sell chemicals was seldom used, and two prior sales of chemicals were too insignificant to establish a sustained trading business. Revenue's Contentions: - The Memorandum of Association allowed the company to manufacture and sell chemicals. - The Directors' report indicated a substantial profit from the sale of chemicals. - Therefore, the profit from the sale of chemicals and raw materials was liable to income-tax.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 25

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

1962 Mah1raj Joeat Bahadur Smgti v.

Badri Pratad Stth Dos J. A1arch :?0, 960 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1962] SllPl'. to that testimony, the lcarne<l District Judge rightly came to the conclusion that cl. (iii) of s.1.1(:!) (a) of the Act was not attracted to the Catie.

For these rea.sons we have com!i to the con- clusion that there is no merit in the appeal whi~h i~ accordingly dismissed with costs.

AppP,al dismissed. K. M. S. REDDY, CO:\fi\HSST01\ER OF INCOME. TAX, KERALA (CODIBATORE), EHNAKl1LA.Jl r. THE WEST COAST CHEMICALS AND JN"DUS- TIUES LTD. (I!\ LIQCIDATION"), ALLEPPX (S. JC DAS, :VT. HrnAYATULLAH and .J.C. SHAH, .TJ.) lncomr Tax-lri11dirig up of bu.sine . .;s-Rra[isation of r1ssf:fs-~)'afe rlurin(f loinding up, if an l'lt;,t of lradi'tl'}-l'rofits an'si1;q out of sale--Lial1ili1y to lox.

The respondent cornpany \\·as incorportrd in 1937 primarily with the object of acqnirini:r and \\·orking- a match factorv.

Under the 1nr.morandun1 of as-;oc:iation the company \\·as a·tso empo\\'Cred, inter a/ia, to rnanufacture and deal in chemicals. The business of rnanufa.cturing 1natches \\':lS carri<~rl on hy the company till 1941. Thercaf1cr thr. prr.•fi

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 25

All 67 judgments and leading authorities on Section 25 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →