M/S. MODI SPINNING & WEAVING MILLS CO., LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PUNJAB & ANR.

CIVIL APPEAL No. 534/1964Supreme Court[1965] 1 S.C.R. 59205 October 1964Bench: 5 JudgesAuthor: P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, K.N. WANCHOO, M. HIDAYATULLAH, RAGHUBAR DAYAL, J.R. MUDHOLKAR9 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Supreme Court held as follows: (i) The assessee was incorrect in interpreting the registration certificate in isolation. Sections 5 and 7 of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948, had to be read with Rule 26 and Form S.T. XXII. The old registration certificate was implicitly modified by these provisions, and the assessee could not rely on the unamended certificate. (ii) It was unnecessary to decide if ginning was a manufacturing process, as the condition that the manufacture must result in goods for sale was not met. The ginned cotton was used for manufacturing cloth outside Punjab, not for sale as a result of manufacture in Punjab. (iii) The contention that the charging section was incomplete was without merit. The old form was deemed modified, and the section and rules were complete and effective irrespective of the new form's prescription. (iv) The provisions of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act were not inoperative due to rate discrepancies with the Central Sales Tax Act. Article 286(3) of the Constitution intended to modify State Acts in accordance with Parliament's law, not to destroy them. The State Act's rate was effectively modified to comply with the Central Act. The appeal was dismissed.

What were the facts?

The assessee, M/s. Modi Spinning & Weaving Mills Co. Ltd., claimed exemption on unginned cotton purchased for Rs. 10,85,842.74 for the assessment year 1959-60. They had a registration certificate issued in 1956. The exemption was claimed under Section 5(2)(a)(ii) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948, which allowed exemption for goods purchased by a registered dealer for use in the manufacture of other goods in Punjab. The assessee ginned the cotton in Punjab and then sent it to Modinagar, U.P., for manufacturing cloth. The Sales Tax authorities disallowed the exemption. The assessee filed a writ petition in the High Court, which was dismissed. The matter reached the Supreme Court via a certificate of fitness.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the registration certificate granted to the appellant in Form III, which did not explicitly contain the words 'in the State of Punjab', permitted the exemption claim when the subsequent manufacture occurred outside Punjab? (Question of law and fact, turning on Section 5(2)(a)(ii) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948). 2. If the condition of manufacture in Punjab was indeed required, was it satisfied by the ginning of raw cotton in Punjab? (Question of fact, turning on Section 5(2)(a)(ii) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948). 3. Could sales tax be levied if the charging section (Section 5) was incomplete due to the amendment in 1959 without a consequential amendment to the prescribed registration form (Form III)? (Question of law, turning on Section 5 of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948). 4. Were Sections 4 and 5 of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948, inoperative due to conflict with Sections 14 and 15 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, regarding maximum tax rates? (Question of law, turning on Article 286(3) of the Constitution of India and Sections 4, 5, 14, and 15 of the respective Acts). Assessee's contentions: (1) The registration certificate did not impose a condition of manufacture within Punjab. (2) Ginning of cotton in Punjab satisfied the condition of manufacture in Punjab. (3) The charging section was incomplete as the amended rules required a modified certificate which was not issued. (4) Sections 4 and 5 of the State Act were inoperative due to conflict with the Central Act's maximum rates. Revenue's contentions: Not recorded in the judgment.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 5(2)(a)(ii),Section 5,Section 7,Section 4,Section 14,Section 15

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

592 M/S. MODI SPINNING & WEAVING MILLS CO., LTD. A v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, PUNJAB & ANR.

October 5, 1964 (P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, C.J., K. N. WANCHOO, M. HIDAYATULLAH, RAGHUBAR DAYAL AND J. R. MUDHOLKAR JJ.)

Pun;ab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 (XLVI of 1948) as amended by Punjab Act XIII of 1959, s. 5(2) (a) (ii)·-'-Exempflon clause amended with- out consequential amendment of form of registraJion-Effect of discrepanary --Charging section wherher incomplete without an1endment of said Form.

Constitution of India, Art. 286(3 )-Rates of tax provided in Stare Act hig)ier than ma.xin1u1n rates provided under ss. 14 and 15 of Central Sales Tax Act-Provision in State Act ·whether becornes inoperative.

Section 7 of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 (XLVI of 1948) required from all dealers liable to pay tax under 1hc Act, as a conditjon of carrying on business in the State, rhat they should secure a registration certificate in the prescrihcd form i.e. Form Ill which would specify the class or classes of goods for the purposes of s. 5 ( 2) (a) (ii).

The said section provided for cxcmp1ion from inclusion in the taxable turn·-0ver of a 1 dealer of goods \vhich \\

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 5

All 847 judgments and leading authorities on Section 5 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →