COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH-TAX, CALCUTIA, NOW WEST BENGAL II vs. TUNGABHADRA INDUSTRIES LTD., CALCUTTA

CIVIL APPEAL No. 1629/1968Supreme Court[1970] 1 S.C.R. 78908 August 1969Bench: 3 JudgesAuthor: J.C. SHAH, V. RAMASWAMI, A.N. GROVER7 pages

AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Supreme Court held that while the market value rule under Section 7(1) may not be suitable for a running business, Section 7(2)(a) allows the Wealth-Tax Officer to determine the net value of business assets based on the balance sheet, with adjustments as circumstances require. The onus is on the assessee to produce material to establish that the written-down value is the true value. In the absence of such material, the Wealth-Tax Officer is justified in adopting the balance-sheet value. The Court also clarified the Tribunal's duty under Section 27(6) to dispose of cases conformably to Supreme Court judgments, which may involve rehearing the appeal after affording parties an opportunity to be heard. The High Court's decision was based on an incorrect premise, and the matter was remanded to the Tribunal for rehearing.

What were the facts?

The respondent company was assessed to wealth-tax for assessment years 1957-58, 1958-59, and 1959-60. The Wealth Tax Officer included the full value of fixed assets as shown in the balance sheets, rejecting the company's contention that they should be assessed at their written-down value for income-tax purposes. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner confirmed this. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, however, held that the written-down value should be adopted. The High Court ruled in favour of the respondent. The Revenue appealed this decision to the Supreme Court.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, for wealth-tax assessment of a running business, the fixed assets should be valued at their balance-sheet value or their written-down value for income-tax purposes, and on whom lies the onus of proof regarding the true value (Section 7(2)(a) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957). Assessee's contention: The written-down value, as computed for income-tax purposes, represents the fair value of the assets. The income-tax depreciation is calculated systematically and scientifically, making it a fair index of the net value of business assets. Revenue's contention: The Wealth Tax Officer is justified in adopting the balance-sheet value of fixed assets in the absence of material from the assessee demonstrating that the written-down value is the true value. The depreciation allowable for income-tax does not determine the market value of assets.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 7(2)(a), Section 27(6), Section 7(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

789 A COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH-TAX, CALCUTIA, NOW WEST BENGAL II B c D E F G H v. TUNGABHADRA INDUSTRIES LTD., CALCUTTA August 8, 1969 [J. C. SHAH, ACTING C.J., V. RAMASWAMI AND A. N. GROVER, JJ.] Wea/th Tax ACt, 1957. ss. 7(2)(a) and 27(6)-Va/uation of assets of ·running business-Value as given in balance-sheet and written down value of dssets-Which tO be adopted for assessment-Assessee must produce material to show ihat value other than that shown in balance-sheet should be adopted-Duty bi Tribunal on receiving judgment of High Court or·· Supreme Court.

The reSpondent: company was assessed to wealth-tax fOr the assess- ment years 1957-58, 1958-59 and 1959-60. In computing the net wealth. of the respondent on the respective valuation dates the Wealth Tax Officer proceeded under s. 7(2) (a) of the Act and included the full value of the fixed assets as shown by the respondent in the res~ctive balance-sheets without any adjustment, after rejecting its contention that the fixed assets should be assessed at. their written down value as computed for the pill'· poses of mcome-tax. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner confirmed the valuation but the Income-tax

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free account Sign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →