KARNANI PROPERTIES LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER QF INCOME TAX, WEST BENGAL

CIVIL APPEAL No. 1874/1968Supreme Court[1972] 1 S.C.R. 45727 August 1971Bench: 2 JudgesAuthor: K.S. HEGDE, A.N. GROVER B8 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What were the facts?

The assessee, Karnani Properties Ltd., owned flats and shops in Calcutta which it let out on rent. The company also supplied electricity, hot and cold water, and provided electric lifts and other amenities to its tenants, maintaining a large staff for these services. The monthly payments from tenants included rent and charges for these services. For assessment years 1956-57 and 1957-58, the assessee claimed the entire receipts as business income. The Income-tax Officer split the receipts into rent (under s. 9) and income from other sources (under s. 12). The Appellate Tribunal held that the services constituted business activity taxable under s. 10. The High Court, on a reference, reappraised the evidence and held the income taxable under s. 9, disagreeing with the Tribunal. The assessee appealed to the Supreme Court.

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in reappraising the facts found by the Tribunal. The jurisdiction of the High Court in a reference under Section 66 is limited to questions of law based on the facts found by the Tribunal. The Court found that the Tribunal's findings indicated the assessee had two distinct sources of income: rent from property and income from business activities (providing services). The services rendered were continuous, organized, and profit-oriented, thus constituting business activities taxable under Section 10. The Court clarified that this decision was based on the facts as found by the Tribunal and did not lay down a general rule for splitting consolidated rents. The High Court's answer was discharged and the question was answered in the affirmative, in favour of the assessee.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the services rendered to the tenants (electrical energy, water, lifts, amenities) constituted a business activity of the assessee taxable under Section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1922? Assessee's contention: The entire receipts from tenants, including charges for services, should be treated as income from business, as the company was formed for the business of letting out flats and shops. The services provided were integral to this business. Revenue's contention: The primary activity was letting out premises, and services were incidental. Alternatively, income from services should be taxed under Section 12(4). The High Court accepted that there was only one source of income, that of letting out premises, and that the authorities had not properly construed lease deeds or appreciated evidence.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 9,Section 10,Section 12,Section 66

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

A B c D E F G H KARNANI PROPERTIES LTD. v. COMMISSIONER QF INCOME TAX, WEST BENGAL August 27, 1971 [K. S. HEGDE AND A. N. GROVER, JJ.] Income Tax Act, 1922, ss. 9, 10, 12, 66-Company owning /lats and shops and letting th•m out on rent-A/so supplying electricity, water and other <ervices to tenants-Income from latter source whether falls under r. 10, or s. 12 of Act-High ,Court in reference cannot go behind the facts io11nd by the Tribunal as mentioned in rtatement of case.

The assessee company owned houses and fiats in Calcutta which it had.

Jet out on rent. The company purchased from the Calcutta Electric Supply Corporation high voltage A. C. current in bulk, converted it into low voltage A.C. current in the company's own power house with the premises. and supplied the power to the tenants.. It also maintained a separate water pump-house and a boiler for the supply of hot and cold water to the tenants. It further provided for the benefit of tenants electric lifts work- ing day ancl night. For all these purposes a large permanent staff was maintatned. The monthly payments by the tenants consisted apart from rent, of charges _in respect ot these services.

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 9

All 523 judgments and leading authorities on Section 9 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →