C. I. T. MADRAS vs. T. V. SUNDRAM IYENGAR (P) LTD.

CIVIL APPEAL No. 1392/1970Supreme Court1975 INSC 9109 April 1975Bench: 3 JudgesAuthor: Y.V. CHANDRACHUD, R.S. SARKARIA, A.C. GUPTA14 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What were the facts?

The assessee, T. V. Sundram Iyengar (P) Ltd., had industrial and non-industrial profits. For the relevant assessment year, 45% of industrial profits amounted to Rs. 1.51 lakhs and 60% of non-industrial profits amounted to Rs. 8.43 lakhs, totaling Rs. 9.94 lakhs as the statutory dividend requirement. The company distributed Rs. 4.20 lakhs as dividends. The Income Tax Officer allocated the distributed dividends in proportion to the profits of the two segments and levied additional super-tax under Section 23A on the entire undistributed balance of Rs. 13.21 lakhs. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner confirmed this. The Appellate Tribunal held that the company had distributed the statutory dividend for industrial profits but upheld the levy for non-industrial profits. The High Court confirmed the Tribunal's view. The appeal is before the Supreme Court.

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Supreme Court held that the High Court and the Tribunal were in error. The Court found that the language of Section 23A(1) and Explanation 2 is clear and does not permit multiple reasonable interpretations. The fiction created by Explanation 2 is expressly limited to the purpose of sub-section (1), which is to ascertain the statutory percentage of profits for each part of the business. However, the levy of additional super-tax under Section 23A(1) is a single levy on the entire undistributed balance of the total income of the previous year. Even if the apportioned dividend in any part of the company's business is less than the statutory requirement, the additional super-tax must be levied on the whole of the undistributed profits of the company. The Court set aside the High Court's order and allowed the appeal.

What were the issues?

1. Whether, on a true interpretation of Section 23A(1) and Explanation 2 of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922, where a company has composite profits (industrial and non-industrial), the additional super-tax can be levied on the entire undistributed balance of total income, or only on the undistributed balance of the specific segment where a shortfall in dividend distribution occurs? (Question of law) Assessee's contention: The fiction created by Explanation 2, deeming profits of each part as total income for that part, must be given full effect. Penalty, being penal, should only be imposed on the part of income where the default occurred. The language of Section 23A(1) read with Explanation 2 is ambiguous, and the interpretation favouring the assessee should be adopted. Revenue's contention: The levy of additional super-tax under Section 23A(1) is a single levy on the entire undistributed balance of the total income. The fiction in Explanation 2 is limited to the purpose of applying statutory percentages separately to each segment's profits, not for isolating the penalty.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 23A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

- -~·* ,,.. .. 'd C.I.T. MADRAS v. T. V. SUNDRAM IYENGAR (P) LTD.

April 9, 1975 [Y. V. CHANDRACHUD, R. S. SARKARIA AND A. C. GUPTA, JJ.] Indian !ncon1e Tax Act, 1922, s. 23 A-Scope of.

Under Section 23A of the Indian Incon1e Tax Act, 1922, if in respect of any previous year the profits and gains distributed as dividends within the 93 A B 12 months immediately fol1owing the expiry of that previous year are Jess than the statutory percentage of the total income of that previous year as reduced by the amounts mentioned in els. (a), (b) and (c) and sub-s. (!),the Income Tax Officer shall make an order that the company shall be liable to C pay super-tax at the prescribed rate on the undistributed balance Of the total income of the previous year. According to Explanation 2. statutory percentage means 45 per cent of the industrial profits and 60 per cent of non-industrial profits.

The explanation further says that the said percentages should be applied separately v.·ith refer.ence to the amounts of profits and gains -attri- butable to the two parts of the company's business as if the said amounts were respectively the total income of the company in relation to each

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 23A

All 45 judgments and leading authorities on Section 23A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →