COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, WEST BENGAL vs. TOLLYGUNGE CLUB LTD.

CIVIL APPEAL No. 578/1972Supreme Court[1977] 3 S.C.R. 22515 March 1977Bench: 2 JudgesAuthor: P.N. BHAGWATI, S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI8 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Supreme Court held that the surcharge collected by the assessee was not income in its hands. The Court reasoned that income tax is a tax on income, and not every receipt is necessarily income. For a receipt to be exigible to tax, it must bear the character of income when it reaches the assessee's hands. The Court found the Revenue's assumptions that the surcharge was part of the admission price and that there was no legally enforceable obligation to be erroneous. The admission to the enclosure was the occasion, not the consideration, for the surcharge. The resolution passed by the General Body created a legally enforceable obligation in the nature of a trust to apply the surcharge for local charities. Therefore, the surcharge was impressed with this obligation at the time of receipt and was diverted before it reached the assessee's hands, never becoming its income. The Court distinguished the case of C.I.T. v. Thakar Das Bhargava, noting that in that case, the obligation to create a trust was voluntary and not imposed by the payer, whereas here, the surcharge was earmarked for charity ab initio with a legal obligation. The appeal was dismissed.

What were the facts?

The assessee, Tollygunge Club Ltd., a company limited by guarantee, conducted horse races. It charged an admission fee and an additional surcharge of eight annas per ticket, earmarked for local charities, as per a resolution passed by its General Body. Prior to assessment year 1960-61, this surcharge was not taxed as the assessee's income. However, for assessment year 1960-61, the Income Tax Officer treated the surcharge receipts as revenue receipts of the assessee, allowing rebate under Section 15B for amounts disbursed to charities. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner confirmed this, viewing the surcharge as part of the admission price. The Tribunal, however, held that the surcharge receipts were not income of the assessee as they were earmarked for charity and thus never belonged to the assessee. The High Court agreed, finding a legally enforceable obligation to apply the surcharge to local charities, diverting it before it reached the assessee as income.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the surcharge of eight annas collected by the assessee on admission tickets, earmarked for local charities, constitutes revenue receipt in the hands of the assessee exigible to tax, or if it was diverted at source due to a legally enforceable obligation to apply it for charitable purposes, turning on the interpretation of Section 15B of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and the nature of the obligation created by the General Body resolution. Assessee's contentions: The surcharge was collected with a legally enforceable obligation to apply it for local charities, meaning it was diverted at source and never became the assessee's income. Reliance was placed on the principle that income impressed with an obligation in the nature of a trust is not taxable in the hands of the recipient if the obligation is overriding. Revenue's contentions: The surcharge was received as part of the price for admission to the club enclosure, and there was no legally enforceable obligation on the assessee to spend the amounts on charity; it was merely a voluntary desire to apply the amounts for charity. Reliance was placed on the case of C.I.T. v. Thakar Das Bhargava.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

15B

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cited by 16 judgments on BharatTax

See all citing judgments →

Counted from the text of the judgments hosted here. Most recent first.

, ' 225 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, WEST BENGAL A v. TOLLYGUNGE CLUB LTD.

March 15, 1977 [P. N. BHAGWATI AND S. MURTAZA fAZAL ALI, JJ.] Income-tax Act. 1922-S. 15B-Diversion of income or diversion of source-Charity su-rcharge whether inco1ne-Obligation in the nature of trust, how to be created. B The assesGee was a Company limited by guarantee and owned a Social ~nd Sports Club one of \vhose· activities consisted of conducting horse races \vith C amateur riders. It charged for admission into the enclosure of the club admis- sion fee !o the guests introduced by the members of the club as \Yell as to the members of the public.

It also charged a surcharge of eight annas solely earmarked for local charities.

That was done pursuant to a resolution passed at the meeting of the General Body providing that ,the surcha!'g<! of eight ann?.s on the f'.:ntrance ticket should be earmarked for local charities.

The Income Tax Officer pdor to the assessment year 1960-61 did not treat 1he receipts on account of surcharge as trading receipts of the assessee and bring them to tax as income of the· a~essee. While making the assessment for the assessment year 1960-61, t

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →