PREMIER CABLE CO. LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN

CIVIL APPEAL No. 393/1992Supreme Court[1999] 2 S.C.R. 14323 March 1999Bench: 2 JudgesAuthor: S.P. BHARUCHA, R.C. LAHOTI CABLE CO. LTD. A8 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What were the facts?

The assessee, Premier Cable Co. Ltd., installed machinery in the previous year relevant to Assessment Year (AY) 1967-68. The assessee was entitled to carry forward unabsorbed development rebate for 8 AYs and deductions under Section 80-J for 4 AYs. The assessee changed its accounting year from March 31st to September 30th. The Income Tax Officer initially allowed the carry forward of these benefits beyond the statutory periods to AY 1976-77. The Commissioner of Income Tax, however, reopened the assessment and disallowed this extension. The assessee's appeals to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and the High Court were unsuccessful. The present appeals are before the Supreme Court.

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Supreme Court held that the assessee was not entitled to carry forward the unabsorbed development rebate and deductions to an extended period of AY 1976-77 on the ground that there was no previous year relevant to AY 1975-76. The Court reasoned that Section 2(9) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, defines 'Assessment Year' as a standard period of 12 months commencing on April 1st every year, which is invariable and does not depend on whether an assessee has a previous year relevant to a particular AY. The 'assessment years' mentioned in Sections 33 and 80J must be read in this light. Unabsorbed development rebate and deductions can only be carried forward for the specified number of AYs (8 for development rebate, 4 for 80J) that follow the AY relevant to the previous year in which the rebate or deduction was first earned. The fact that the assessee did not have a previous year relevant to a particular AY within these prescribed spans is of no consequence for calculating the carry-forward periods. The Court agreed with the High Court's view and dismissed the appeals. Issues 1 and 5 were not pressed by the assessee.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the Commissioner of Income Tax had jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, to revise the order of the Income Tax Officer passed after obtaining directions from the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner under Section 144B. 2. Whether the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that AY 1975-76 is the 8th AY succeeding AY 1967-68 for the purpose of carrying forward unabsorbed development rebate under Section 33(2)(ii), and not AY 1976-77. 3. Whether the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that for the purpose of carrying forward 80J relief, AY 1975-76 is the 4th AY succeeding AY 1971-72, and not AY 1976-77. 4. Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that as far as the assessee was concerned, it cannot be said that AY 1975-76 did not exist. Assessee's contentions: Due to the change in the accounting year, the assessee had no previous year relevant to AY 1975-76, and therefore, AY 1975-76 did not exist for the assessee. Consequently, the assessee was entitled to carry forward the unabsorbed development rebate and deduction to AY 1976-77. Revenue's contentions: Not recorded in the judgment.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 2(9),Section 33,Section 80-J,Section 263,Section 144B,Section 3,Section 4,Section 33(2)(ii)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

PREMIER CABLE CO. LTD. A ~ v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN MARCH 23, 1999 [S.P. BHARUCHA AND R.C. LAHOTI, JJ.] B Income Tax Act, 1961-Ss. 2(9), 33 and 80-J-Assessment year- Determination of-Installation of machinery-Development rebate and deductions-Entitlement to carry forward for a period of 8 and 4 Assessment c Years-Change in the accounting year-No previous year relevant to the Assessment year-Effect of-Whether assessee entitled to extend period of - Assessment year for carrying forward development rebate and deductions? , Held; No, Assessment year is a standard period of twelve months which is invariable-Assessee not having any previous year relevant to the Assessment year tzas no consequence in calculating the Assessment periods for deductions D and rebate.

Words & Phrases: ''Assessment year' '-Meaning and scope of in the context of Sec. 2(9) E of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Appellant-assessee, installed machinery in the previous year relevant to the Assessment year 1967-68. Under Ss. 33 and 80-J of the Income Tax Act, 1961, assessee was entitled to carry forward the unabsorbed development rebate and deduction for a period of 8 and 4 Assessment yea

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 33

All 65 judgments and leading authorities on Section 33 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →