M/S. K. GOVINDAN AND SONS vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, COCHIN

CIVIL APPEAL No. 1144/1999Supreme Court2000 INSC 56101 December 2000Bench: 3 JudgesAuthor: S.P. BHARUCHA, D.P. MOHAPATRA, Y.K. SABHARWAL MIS. K. GOVINDAN AND SONS A11 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What were the facts?

The assessee filed a return of income for Assessment Year 1984-85 in response to a notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer charged interest under Section 139(8) and Section 217. The assessee contended that the assessment under Section 147 was not a 'regular assessment' as defined in Section 2(40), and thus interest under Section 139(8) was not leviable. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal initially agreed with the assessee. However, the Revenue filed a reference application, and the High Court, holding that an assessment under Section 147 is a 'regular assessment' and Explanation 2 to Section 139(8) is clarificatory, ruled in favour of the Revenue. The assessee appealed this High Court judgment.

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Supreme Court held that an initial assessment made under Section 147, whether voluntary or in response to a notice under Section 148, is a 'regular assessment' for the purpose of Section 139(8). The Court reasoned that to hold otherwise would lead to an absurd situation where an assessee filing a delayed return would be liable for interest, while one who fails to file a return at all would escape it. The Court affirmed that this interpretation aligns with the legislative intent of charging interest on defaulting assessees. The Court also held that Explanation 2 to Section 139(8), introduced by the 1984 amendment, is clarificatory in nature, removing doubts raised by certain High Court decisions, and thus applies to the assessment year 1984-85. The Court approved the decisions of the Madras, Delhi, and Kerala High Courts and overruled the decisions of the Gauhati and Punjab & Haryana High Courts. The appeal was dismissed.

What were the issues?

1. Whether an assessment made under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is a 'regular assessment' for the purpose of levying interest under Section 139(8) of the Act? - Assessee's contention: The assessment under Section 147 is a 're-opened assessment' and not a 'regular assessment' as defined in Section 2(40), therefore, interest under Section 139(8) cannot be charged. - Revenue's contention: An assessment made for the first time under Section 147 read with Section 148 is a 'regular assessment', and Explanation 2 to Section 139(8) clarifies this position, making the levy of interest valid. 2. Whether Explanation 2 to Section 139(8) of the Act, as added by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984, is clarificatory or amendatory in nature and applicable to Assessment Year 1984-85? - Assessee's contention: The explanation is amendatory and does not apply retrospectively to the period in question. - Revenue's contention: The explanation is clarificatory and confirms the existing position that assessments under Section 147 are regular assessments.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 139(8),Section 147,Section 148,Section 217,Section 2(40),Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

) MIS. K. GOVINDAN AND SONS A v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, COCHIN DECEMBER I, 2000 [S.P. BHARUCHA, D.P. MOHAPA TRA AND Y.K. SABHARWAL, JJ.] B lncome-Tax Act, {96/-Section 139 (8) Explanation 2 as added by Taxation laws (Amendment) Act, 1984, Sections 147, 148, 217~ -lnterest- liability of assessee to pay-Income escaping assessment- -Assessment made C u/s 147-Whether it is open to assessing authority to charge interest for default in filing return u!s I 39 (8) of the Act-Held, Yes-Term 'regular assessment' for purpose of section I 39 (8)-Meaning o/-Held, First or initial assessment u/s I 47 is a regular assessment-·-Explanation 2 to Section I 39(8), introduced by (Amendment) Act, 1984 is merely a clarificatory provisio11c-lt has application to period of assessment I 984-85. The appellant-assessee filed a return of income in response to a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on which the assessing authority charged interest under Section 139(8) and also u/s 217 of the Act.

The assessee challenged the order alleging that the assessment in the case D was not a 'regular assessment' within the meaning of section 2(40) of the E Act, and ther

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 139(8)

All 27 judgments and leading authorities on Section 139(8) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →