THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-KOLHAPUR vs. THE RATNAKAR BANK LTD.

CIVIL APPEAL No. 6088/2008Supreme Court[2008] 14 S.C.R. 37313 October 2008Bench: 2 JudgesAuthor: ARIJIT PASAYAT, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA4 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What were the facts?

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) appealed against the Bombay High Court's decision, which upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's order. The dispute concerned whether interest earned by the assessee-bank, The Ratnakar Bank Ltd., on government securities was chargeable to tax under Section 2(7) of the Interest Tax Act, 1974. The Tribunal and the High Court had held that it was not chargeable. The Revenue contended that interest on securities, bonds, and debentures falls within the definition of "Interest chargeable to tax" under Section 2(7) of the Interest Act. The assessee-bank supported the lower authorities' decisions. The Supreme Court noted a similar issue decided in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Corporation Bank.

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Supreme Court observed that a similar issue was decided in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Corporation Bank (2008) 166 Taxman 388, where it was held that there is a basic difference between loans and advances on the one hand and investments/securities on the other. The Court agreed with the view expressed by the Bombay High Court in that case, which was accepted by the revenue. However, in the present case, the Revenue denied the assessee's stand that the interest earned was solely on government securities. Therefore, the Supreme Court directed the Tribunal to examine the factual position as to whether the interest involved was indeed on government securities. If it was solely on government securities, the ratio of the Corporation Bank's case would apply. If the interest earned was not solely on government securities, the ratio of that decision would not apply. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.

What were the issues?

1. Whether interest earned by the assessee-bank on government securities is chargeable to tax under Section 2(7) read with Section 4 of the Interest Tax Act, 1974 (question of law)? Assessee's contention: The interest earned was on government securities only, and therefore, not chargeable to tax, relying on the ratio of the Supreme Court's decision in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Corporation Bank. Revenue's contention: The Tribunal and the High Court erred in holding that loans and advances do not include interest on securities, bonds, and debentures, and therefore, such interest is liable to tax under the provisions of the Interest Tax Act, 1974. It was argued that interest on securities falls within the meaning of "Interest chargeable to tax" as defined under Section 2(7) of the Interest Act.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 2(7),Section 4,Section 260A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

[2008] 14 S.C.R. 373 ··i' THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-KOLHAPUR A II. THE RATNAKAR BANK LTD. (Civil Appeal Nos.6088-6090 of 2008) OCTOBER 13, 2008 B [DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT AND DR. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, JJ.] Interest Tax Act, 197 4 - s. 2(7) rlw s.4 - Chargeable inter- est - Interest on Government securities - Distinction between c investment/securities and loans/advances - Supreme Court decision in Corporation Bank's case that interest earned by assessee-bank on government securities is not chargeable to tax under s.2(7) - Applicability of Dispute arose as to whether interest earned by the D assessee (Respondent-bank) on government securities was chargeable to tax under s.2(7) of the Interest Tax Act, 1974. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that it was not chargeable. The order of Tribunal was upheld by the High Court. Hence the present appeals by the Revenue. E Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD: The stand of assessee-Respondent that the interest earned was on government securities only is de- ' \ nied by the appellant. Let the Tribunal examine the fac- F tual position as to whether the interest involved in the present case is on government secur

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 2(7)

All 52 judgments and leading authorities on Section 2(7) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →