THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, II, TIRUCHIRAPALLI vs. CITY UNION BANK LTD.

CIVIL APPEAL No. 2690/2006Supreme Court[2008] 14 S.C.R. 38513 October 2008Bench: 2 JudgesAuthor: ARIJIT PASAYAT, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA4 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What were the facts?

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Revenue) appealed against the judgment of the Madras High Court, which upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision. The Tribunal had ruled that interest earned by the assessee bank, City Union Bank Ltd., on government securities was not chargeable to tax under Section 2(7) of the Interest Tax Act, 1974. The Revenue contended that interest on securities falls within the definition of "Interest chargeable to tax" under Section 2(7) of the Interest Act, and therefore, should be taxed. The assessee bank supported the High Court's decision. A similar issue had been decided by the Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Corporation Bank, where it was held that interest earned by banks on dated government securities was not liable to be assessed under Section 2(7) read with Section 4 of the Interest Tax Act, 1974, distinguishing between loans/advances and investments/securities. The Revenue, however, disputed whether the interest in the present case was solely on government securities.

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Supreme Court noted that a similar issue concerning interest earned by banks on dated government securities had been decided in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Corporation Bank. In that case, the Court held that there is a basic difference between loans and advances on one hand, and investments/securities on the other, and that interest on dated government securities was not liable to be assessed under Section 2(7) read with Section 4 of the Interest Tax Act, 1974. The Court agreed with the Bombay High Court's view in similar cases, which the revenue had accepted. In the present appeal, the Revenue disputed whether the interest earned was solely on government securities. Therefore, the Supreme Court directed the Tribunal to examine the factual position to ascertain if the interest involved was indeed on government securities. If it was, the ratio of the Corporation Bank decision would apply. If the interest earned was not solely on government securities, the ratio of that decision would not apply. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.

What were the issues?

1. Whether interest earned by the assessee bank on government securities is liable to be assessed under Section 2(7) of the Interest Tax Act, 1974? (Question of law) Assessee's contentions: The assessee bank supported the High Court's judgment, which upheld the Tribunal's view that interest on government securities was not chargeable under Section 2(7) of the Interest Tax Act, 1974. The assessee relied on the Supreme Court's decision in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Corporation Bank. Revenue's contentions: The Revenue argued that the Tribunal and the High Court erred in holding that loans and advances do not include interest on securities, bonds, and debentures, thus making them not liable to tax under the Interest Act. The Revenue contended that interest on securities falls within the meaning of "Interest chargeable to tax" as defined under Section 2(7) of the Interest Act. The Revenue also disputed the assessee's claim that the interest earned in this case was solely on government securities.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 2(7),Section 4,Section 260A,Section 24

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

[2008] 14 S.C.R. 385 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, II, TIRUCHIRAPALLI v. CITY UNION BANK LTD. (Civil Appeal No. 2690 of 2006) OCTOBER 13, 2008 [DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT AND DR. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, JJ] Interest Tax Act, 1974: s. 2(7) - Interest earned by Bank on Government Secu- rities - HELD: The Tribunal would examine the factual posi- tion and accordingly decide in view of the decision of Supreme Court- Income Tax Act, 1961. In the instant appeal, the question before the Court was as to whether interest earned by assessee Bank on Government Securities was liable to be assessed u/s 2(7) of the Interest Act, 1974. A B c D Disposing of the appeal, the Court E HELD: Let the Tribunal examine the factual posi- tion as to whether the interest involved in the instant case is on government securities. If that be so, the ratio of the decision in the case of Corporation Bank* will ap- ply to the facts of the case and if the interest earned is F not solely on government securities, the same will not apply. [para 4] [387-H; 388-A] *Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Corporation Bank 2008(166) Taxman 388 - referred to. G CASE LAW REFERENCE 2008(166) Taxman 388 referred t

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 2(7)

All 52 judgments and leading authorities on Section 2(7) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →