THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLHAPUR vs. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF INDIA LTD.

CIVIL APPEAL No. 7437/2004Supreme Court[2008] 14 S.C.R. 38113 October 2008Bench: 2 JudgesAuthor: ARIJIT PASAYAT, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA4 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What were the facts?

The appeals concern the assessment of interest earned by the assessee-bank, Industrial Development Bank of India Ltd., on government securities for the assessment year(s) not specified. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolhapur (the revenue) challenged the Bombay High Court's judgment, which upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision. Both lower authorities held that the interest earned on government securities was not liable to be assessed under Section 2(7) of the Interest Tax Act, 1974. The revenue argued that interest on securities falls within the definition of "Interest chargeable to tax" under Section 2(7). A key dispute arose regarding whether the interest in question was solely earned on government securities.

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Supreme Court referred to its prior decision in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Corporation Bank (2008) which held that interest earned on government securities is not liable to be assessed under Section 2(7) of the Interest Tax Act, 1974. The Court noted a dispute between the parties regarding whether the interest earned in the present case was solely on government securities. Consequently, the Court directed the Tribunal to examine the factual position. If the interest was found to be earned solely on government securities, the ratio of the Corporation Bank's case would apply. However, if the interest was not solely on government securities, the ratio of that decision would not apply. The appeals were disposed of based on this direction.

What were the issues?

1. Whether interest earned by the assessee-bank on government securities is liable to be assessed under Section 2(7) of the Interest Tax Act, 1974? Assessee's contentions: The assessee-bank supported the High Court's judgment, which upheld the Tribunal's view that the interest earned on government securities was not chargeable under Section 2(7) of the Interest Tax Act, 1974. Revenue's contentions: The revenue argued that the Tribunal and the High Court erred in holding that loans and advances do not include interest on securities, bonds, and debentures, thus making them not liable to tax under the Interest Act. The revenue contended that interest on securities falls within the meaning of "Interest chargeable to tax" as defined under Section 2(7) of the Interest Act.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 2(7),Section 4,Section 260A,Section 24

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

[2008] 14 S.C.R. 381 -=-+ THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLHAPUR A II. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF INDIA LTD. (Civil Appeal Nos.7437-7438 of 2004) OCTOBER 13, 2008 B [DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT AND DR. MUKUNDAKAM ·+: SHARMA, JJ.] Interest Tax Act, 197 4 - s. 2(7) - Interest earned by as- sessee-Bank on Government Securities - Held: Is not liable c to be assessed u/s 2(7) - In the instant case, the question as to whether the interest earned was on Government Securities, is since disputed, direction to Tribunal to decide the question - Interest not be made assessable to tax only if found to have been earned solely on Government Securities. 0 The question for consideration in the instant appeals "< was whether the interest earned by the assessee-Bank on Government Securities was liable to be assessed u/s 2(7) of Interest Tax Act, 197 4. Appellate Tribunal as well as High Court held that it was not chargeable. E In appeal to this Court, the question as to whether the interest involved in the instant case was on Govern- ment Securities was disputed by the parties. .....

Disposing of the appeals, the Court F ·-+\ ·HELD: In *Corporation Bank's case it was held

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 2(7)

All 52 judgments and leading authorities on Section 2(7) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →