M/S. INDIA CINE AGENCIES vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRAS

CIVIL APPEAL No. 3649/2003Supreme Court[2008] 15 S.C.R. 112212 November 2008Bench: 2 JudgesAuthor: ARIJIT PASAYAT, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA11 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What were the facts?

The appeals before the Supreme Court concerned the entitlement of assessees to benefits under Sections 32AB, 80HH, and 80I of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The core issue was whether the conversion of jumbo rolls of photographic film into smaller rolls of various sizes constituted "manufacture" or "production" for the purpose of claiming these deductions. The assessees contended that this process amounted to manufacture/production, while the Revenue argued it did not. In some instances, the High Court had ruled against the assessees, citing Item 10 of the Eleventh Schedule of the Act.

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, holding that the conversion of jumbo rolls of photographic film into smaller rolls of desired sizes constitutes "manufacture" or "production" for the purpose of claiming deductions under Sections 32AB, 80HH, and 80I of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court defined "manufacture" as the production of articles for use from raw or prepared materials by giving them new forms, qualities, properties, or combinations. It emphasized that a change amounts to manufacture when it results in a new and distinct article that is commercially different from the original commodity, having its own character, use, and name. The Court cited several precedents, including Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax (Law), Board of Revenue (Taxes), Emakulam v. Mis. Coco Fibres, Collector of Central Excise, Jaipur v. Rajasthan State Chemical Works, Deedwana, Rajasthan, and Ujagar Prints v. Union of India. The Court also noted that the word "production" has a wider connotation than "manufacture" and includes bringing into existence new goods by a process that may or may not amount to manufacture. The Court directed that the appeals be allowed.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the conversion of jumbo rolls of photographic film into smaller rolls of different sizes amounts to "manufacture" or "production" for the purpose of claiming deductions under Sections 32AB, 80HH, and 80I of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Assessee's Contention: The assessee argued that the conversion process resulted in a new and distinct commercial commodity, thus qualifying as manufacture/production. They relied on various judicial pronouncements defining "manufacture" and "production" broadly. Revenue's Contention: The Revenue contended that the conversion did not amount to manufacture or production. In some cases, the High Court also considered that Item 10 of the Eleventh Schedule might preclude such deductions.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 32AB,Section 80HH,Section 80I

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

A B [2008] 15 s. c. R. 1122 MIS. INDIACINE AGENCIES .. COMMJSSIQ~ER OF l~COME TAX, MADRAS (Civil.AppeaLNos. 3649-3650 of 2003) NOVEMBER. 12, 2008 [DR. AR1jrr PASAYAJ AND DR. 0 MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA,.JJ.] .

Income ·rax Act, 1961; Ss. 32AB, 80HH.and 801 and C Schedule 11. inserted by Finance (Ac.t N0.2), .1977:.

Permissible deduction - Conversion of Jumbo rolls of photographic. film into small rolls...;. Whether amounting to manufacture/production for claiming deduction in terms of Ss. 0 32AB, 80HH and s.801of1961 Act- Held: Such a conversion could· be termed as manufacture/production of small rolls of ,... E . photographic film for claiming benefit of permissible deduction urider the relevant provisions of the 1961 Act. ·•·· Words and Phrases. . . . 'Manufacture', ;Production', 'Prodl1ce' - Meaning of, in the context of'Ss'.32AB, 80HH and 801 of the Income Tax Act, 1961; . ,' ··The ··i.sslJe ~'1ich arose· for. determi~atlon. ln·:thes~ F appeals wa$as to.whether the conversion of Jumbo rolls . ofphotographiC 'films into small rolls of different sizes not amounted .to manufacture/production as contended by the Revenue or amounted to manufacture/production a

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 32AB

All 34 judgments and leading authorities on Section 32AB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →