OXYGEN A MOVEMENT EDUCATIONAL TRUST,PATNA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION, PATNA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) and remitted the issue back to the CIT(A) to adjudicate on the merits of the case after providing a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a registered trust, filed its return of income and was denied exemption under sections 11 and 12. The assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A) with a significant delay, which was not condoned, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without considering the merits.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) should be condoned and whether the appeal should be decided on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 11,Section 12,Section 143(1),Section 250,Section 249(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PATNA BENCH, PATNA
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU
PER LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, AM: This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) by the learned Addl./Jt. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)- 2, Hyderabad [hereinafter referred to as ‘the ld. JCIT(A)’], dated 28.02.2026 vide DIN No. ITBA/APL/S/250/2025-26/1086700022(1), wherein the ld. JCIT(A) has not condoned the delay of 263 days and dismissed the appeal of the assessee without going into the merits of the case.
Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the assessee is a trust and registered u/s 12A of the Act and filed its return of income on 2 ITA No.425/Pat/2026/AY 2021-22 Oxygen A Movement Educational T
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026