ARVIND TIWARI,ANNAPURNA ROAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICCER 1(2), INDORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the donation was bogus as the political party was found to be involved in tax evasion and did not engage in genuine political activities. The party also failed to submit required reports to the Election Commission.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a deduction of Rs. 6,50,000/- for donation to Rashtriya Samajwadi Party (Secular) under Section 80GGC. Investigations revealed this party was part of a scam involving bogus donations and re-routing of funds.
What were the issues?
Whether the donation claimed as deduction under Section 80GGC was genuine, and if the political party's non-compliance with reporting requirements invalidated the deduction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80GGC,Section 147,Section 132,Section 29C,Section 13A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI & SHRI ARVIND SONI
Per Paresh M. Joshi, JM:
This is an Appeal filed by the Assessee under section 253 of the Income Tax Act 1961, [ herein after referred to as the Act
for the sake of brevity] before this tribunal as & by way of a second Appeal. The Assessee is aggrieved by the order
bearing Number:- ITBA / NFAC / S / 250 / 2025-26 /
1085584006 (1) dated 04.02.2026 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)
Arvind Tiwari ITA No. 537/Ind/2026 AY-2019-20 U/S 250 of the Act, which is herein after referred to as the “Impugned Order”. The Relevant Assessment Year is 2019-
20 and the corresponding previous year period is from 01.04.2018 to 31.03.2019. 2. FACTUAL MATRIX
1 That as and by way of an Assessmen
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80GGC
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mazharkhan Nasrullahkhan Pathan, Ahmedabad vs ITO Ward 1(2)(3), AhmedabadITA 2342/AHD/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Kamleshkumar Somalal Bhatt, Himatnagar vs Income Tax Ofifcer, Ward 1, HimatnagarITA 2130/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2124/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026