BEERAN SINGH RAJPUT,BHOPAL vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ASSESSMENT UNIT, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT found that while the CIT(A) had provided opportunities, the assessee's response was limited to adjournment requests. However, considering the assessee's undertaking to participate diligently, the ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s order.
What were the facts?
The assessee's income was assessed at Rs 83,48,280, with an addition of Rs 74,85,000. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's first appeal ex-parte for non-compliance. The assessee appealed to the ITAT, arguing a violation of natural justice.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without providing adequate opportunity, and whether the addition made by the AO was justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144B,Section 246A,Section 253,Section 68
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI & SHRI ARVIND SONI
Per Paresh M. Joshi, JM:
This is an Appeal filed by the Assessee under section 253 of the Income Tax Act 1961, [ herein after referred to as the Act
for the sake of brevity] before this tribunal as & by way of a second Appeal. The Assessee is aggrieved by the order
bearing Number:- ITBA / NFAC / S / 250 / 2025-26 /
1080226924(1) dated 01.09.2025 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)
Beeran Singh Rajput ITA No. 964/Ind/2025 AY-2016-17 U/S 250 of the Act, which is herein after referred to as the “Impugned Order”. The Relevant Assessment Year is 2016-
17 and the corresponding previous year period is from 01.04.2015 to 31.03.2016. 2. FACTUAL MA
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026