DARBAR SINGH,VILLAGE-KACHRIYA JAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, MANDSAUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT condoned the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) due to the assessee's illness. The Tribunal decided to remand the case back to the Assessing Officer to provide the assessee with an opportunity of being heard.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT after the CIT(A) dismissed their appeal as time-barred. The assessee contended that the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) was due to severe illness and sought an opportunity to present their case.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) was justifiable due to the assessee's medical condition, and whether the assessee should be granted an opportunity of being heard.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
None specified
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, इंदौर "यायपीठ, इंदौर "ी परेश म.जोशी, "या"यक सद"य तथा "ी अर"वंद सोनी, लेखा सद"य के सम" आ.अ.सं. 1085/इंदौर/2025 "नधा"रण वष" : 2018-19 दरबार "संह बनाम आयकर अ"धकार" "ाम कचा"रया जाट मंदसौर तहसील सीतामऊ मंदसौर अपीलाथ" ""यथ" "था.ले.सं.- एचयूईपीएस 3340 एल PAN : HUEPS3340L अपीलाथ" क" ओर से "ी अशोक र"नावत, सीए राज"व क" ओर से "ी "बनय कुमार राय, व"र"ठ "वभागीय ""त"न"ध सुनवाई "त"थ 16.09.2026 उ"घोषणा "त"थ 24.09.2026 आदेश "ी अर"वंद सोनी, लेखा सद"य "वारा "नधा"रण वष" 2018-19 के "लए "नधा"रती "वारा यह अपील "व"वान आयकर आयु"त (अपील), नेशनल फेसलेस अपील स"टर, नई "द"ल" के आदेश "दनांक 07.10.2025 के "व""ध अपील के आधार" म" व"ण"त आधार" पर दा"खल क" गई ह" । 2. इस अपील क" सुनवाई के दौरान, "नधा"रती के "व"वान "ा"धकृत ""त"न"ध ने "नवेदन "कया "क इस "करण म" "व"वान "नधा"रण अ"धकार" "वारा "नधा"रती के "व""ध एक प"ीय (Ex parte) आदेश पा"रत "कया गया । "नधा"रण अ"धकार" के इस आदेश से असंतु"ट होकर "नधा"रती ने "व"वान आयकर आयु"त (अपील) के सम" अपील दा"खल क" थी । य"य"प "व"वान आयकर आयु"त (अपील) "वारा "नधा"रती क" अपील 489 "दन" से
आ.अ.सं. 1085/इंदौर/2025 2 दरबार "संह, "ाम कच"रया जाट, मंदसौर कालबा"धत होने के कारण गुणागुण पर "वचार "कए "बना खा"रज क" थी । "नधा"रती के "व"वान अ"धव"ता ने इस "यायपीठ के सम" "नवेदन "कया "क उस
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026