MIRAGE LIFESTYLE PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 1(1), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee was not provided with adequate time and opportunity to present its case, and crucial documents like Annexure-A were not supplied. Therefore, the orders of the lower authorities were set aside.
What were the facts?
The assessee's income was reassessed, and an addition of Rs. 1,30,21,050/- was made under Section 68 as unexplained cash credit. The assessee argued that the reassessment proceedings were flawed due to procedural irregularities and lack of proper opportunity.
What were the issues?
Whether the reassessment proceedings were vitiated due to procedural lapses and violation of principles of natural justice, and if the addition under Section 68 was justified without proper evidence and opportunity.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 68,Section 147,Section 144,Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 148,Section 151,Section 250,Section 254
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘C’ BENCH AT KOLKATA
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA
PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter ITA No(s). 484/KOL/2026 Assessment Year(s) 2013-14 Mirage Lifestyle Pvt. Ltd. referred to as Ld. 'CIT(A)'] passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinaft
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026