SUNIL KUMAR AGARWAL,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T., CC - 3(2),, KOLKATA
What were the facts?
The assessee, claiming to be an old settler of Sikkim, declared NIL income. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment under Section 147/144, making an addition of ₹1,83,08,466/-. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, acknowledging the bonafide reasons. Following a coordinate bench's decision and considering the Supreme Court's ruling on the 'Old Settlers of Sikkim' issue, the appeals were restored to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee qualifies as an 'Old Settler of Sikkim' for exemption under Section 10(26AAA) and whether the assessment order under Section 147/144 is valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JM
Per PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JM:
These are appeals preferred by the assessee against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Siliguri (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] even dated 05.11.2019 for the AY 2011-12 to 2015-16. 2. At the outset, we note that the appeals of the assessee are barred by limitation by 2027 days. At the time of hearing the counsel of the assessee explained the reasons for delay in filing the appeal. The Ld. D.R on the other hand raises objections in condoning the delay. After hearing the rival conten
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(26AAA)
- Mukesh Kumar Agarwal, Sikkim, Gangtok vs I.T.O., Ward - 3(1), GangtokITA 2630/KOL/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2019-2020
- Sunil Kumar Agarwal, Kolkata vs D.C.I.T., CC - 3(2), KolkataITA 1860/KOL/2025[2013-2014]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2013-2014
- Sunil Kumar Agarwal, Gangtok, Sikkim vs D.C.I.T., CC - 3(2), KolkataITA 1858/KOL/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2011-2012
- Ashok Agarwal, Sikkim vs ITO, Circle 3(2), GangtokITA 2467/KOL/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed14 Sept 2026AY 2012-2013
- Manoj Kumar Pandey, Lingmoo vs ITO, Ward 3(1), GangtokITA 2313/KOL/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed2 Sept 2026AY 2017-2018
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Samir Halder vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026