SEVA SINDHU VISHWASTHA MANDALI,BANGALORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - EXEMPTIONS, BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT erred in rejecting the application solely on the lack of financial expenditure, especially when activities were claimed to be free. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided some evidence like photographs and confirmation letters from teachers.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act. The CIT (Exemptions) rejected the application, stating that the trust had not undertaken any activities and failed to provide documentary evidence for its claimed free classes.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT was justified in rejecting the registration application for lack of financial expenditure when the activities were claimed to be free, and whether sufficient inquiry was made by the CIT.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B’’BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI BALAKRISHNAN S. & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
PER KESHAV DUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the order of the Ld. CIT (Exemptions), Bengaluru dated 30.12.2025 vide DIN & Notice No. ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2025-26/1084234841 (1) rejecting the application filed for registration u/s 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”).
The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:-
The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) has erred in law and on facts in passing the impugned order rejecting the application for registration under section 12AB(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The impugned order as
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026