AKRAM KARIM KHAN,AURANGABAD vs. ITO WARD 1(1), AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal held that the CIT(A) is obligated to decide appeals on merits and cannot dismiss them for non-prosecution. The CIT(A)'s order was set aside for de-novo adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee failed to comply with notices from the AO and CIT(A) during reassessment proceedings. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal for non-compliance without adjudicating the grounds, including the validity of reassessment.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) can dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution without adjudicating the grounds of appeal, and the validity of reassessment proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144,Section 144B,Section 148A,Section 148,Section 250,Section 250(6),Section 251
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE
Before: SHRI Dr. DIPAK P. RIPOTE & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
PER Dr. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, A.M : This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), NFAC, Delhi [Ld.CIT(A)], passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 („the Act‟) for AY 2018-19 on 08.01.2026, emanating from the Assessment Order u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s. 144B of the Act, dated 28.09.2023. Findings and Analysis :
We have heard both the parties and perused the records. In this case, the assessee is an individual. There was information to the Assessing Officer (AO) on INSIGHT Portal for AY 2018-19 regarding sale of immovable property, cash deposit and sale of motor vehicle. Based on the same, notice u/s 148A(b) of the Act was issued to t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026