ARUN KUMAR BHAUMIK,KOLKATA vs. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 50(1), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 69A is not applicable as the money was recorded in the assessee's books and was part of a legitimate transaction of depositing and remitting funds for stamp paper issuance. The addition made by the AO and sustained by the CIT(A) was incorrect.
What were the facts?
The assessee, an authorized stamp vendor, deposited cash collected from customers into his bank account and then remitted it to the government treasury. The Assessing Officer treated these deposits totaling ₹96,77,000/- as unexplained money under Section 69A.
What were the issues?
Whether cash deposits made by an authorized stamp vendor, which are subsequently remitted to the government treasury, can be treated as unexplained money under Section 69A of the Income-tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, KOLKATA
Per Rajesh Kumar, AM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 13.03.2026 for the AY 2017-18. 2. The only issue raised by the assessee is against the order of Ld. CIT (A) confirming the addition of ₹96,77,000/- as made by the Ld. AO u/s 69A of the Act as unexplained money.
The facts in brief are that the assessee filed the return of income on 29.05.2017, declaring total income of ₹28,05,810/- . The case of the assessee was processed u/s 143(1) of the Act. Thereafter, the case was taken up for scrutiny proceedings and notice u/s 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act were
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 69A
- Vishal Kumar Patel(HUF), Raipur vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), RaipurITA 595/RPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026