ITS INDIA PVT. LTD,MUMBAI vs. THE ASSESSING OFFICER, MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The assessee's assessment was reopened under Section 147. The Assessing Officer issued multiple notices under Section 148A(b) and passed the order under Section 148A(d) beyond the prescribed limitation period, considering the exclusion of time granted to the assessee.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the order passed under Section 148A(d) was barred by limitation due to the Assessing Officer issuing subsequent notices under Section 148A(b) to gain extension of time. Consequently, the assessment order was declared void ab initio.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessment order is void ab initio due to the invalid assumption of jurisdiction under Section 147, specifically concerning the timeliness of the order passed under Section 148A(d) and the validity of subsequent notices under Section 148A(b).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144B,Section 148,Section 148A,Section 149,Section 129
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
Per Saktijit Dey, Vice President:
The captioned appeal by the assessee arises out of order dated 12.12.2025 passed by National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, pertaining to Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. In Ground No. 1, the assessee has challenged the validity of the assessment order passed under Section 147 read with Section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, “the Act”).
Since the issue raised in this ground is a purely legal a
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 640/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 639/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 638/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Kishorbhai C Bhagtani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward 2(1)(1), RajkotITA 999/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Malhar Nitin Bhuptani, Rajkotq vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1054/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Debashis Dutta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Venky Re Rolling Private Limited vs. State Of Bihar Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Bihar PatnaPatna · 6 Oct 2026
- Sakti Pada Ghosh vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax Midnapore Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Fakhruddin Husainibhai @ Fakhruddin Hasainbhai vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026