HANOZE HARISH THAKKAR ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 19(1)(5), MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The assessee's assessment and first appeal were decided ex parte. The Assessing Officer made additions for salary, interest, commission, business income, and unexplained investment in immovable property. The assessee also claimed credit for TDS which was not granted.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the addition for unexplained investment and restored it to the Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication, directing the assessee to provide supporting documents. The Tribunal also directed the Assessing Officer to verify and grant credit for TDS as admissible.
What were the issues?
Whether additions made by the AO and sustained by the CIT(A) were justified without proper opportunity to the assessee, and whether TDS credit was correctly denied.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI
Before: SMT. BEENA PILLAI, HON’BLE & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, HON’BLE
PER SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
ITA 9314/MUM/2025 HANOZE HARISH THAKKAR
The present appeal is filed by the assessee against the order dated 18/12/2025 passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi, [hereinafter referred to as “Ld.CIT(A)”] for Assessment Year 2014-15 on following grounds of appeal:
“1. In the facts and cir
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 69
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs M/S Rajguru Foods, BijapurITA 77/PAN/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Khubchandani, Raipur vs DCIT, Circle 1(1), RaipurITA 437/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Kishorbhai C Bhagtani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward 2(1)(1), RajkotITA 999/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ram Chandra Choudhary, Jaipur vs ITO WD 7(2), Jpr, JaipurITA 714/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Kamli Devi, Alwar vs ITO, Ward-1(2), AlwarITA 214/JPR/2026[2011-12]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2011-12
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sri Kamatchi Agencies vs. The Deputy Commissioner (Appeal)Madras · 6 Oct 2026
- Dr S.Surya Prakash vs. The Secretary TO GovernmentMadras · 6 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax Midnapore Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Sanmargg Agrotrade INDIA Private Limtied And Anr. vs. Superintendent Central Tax Group-36 Circle-08 Office Of The Commissioner Of Central Tax And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Ramkrishna Datta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026