MADHU BALA,DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-16, DELHI
What were the facts?
The assessee's case was reopened under Section 147 after a search operation. The assessee challenged the assessment order, arguing that the approval granted under Section 148B was vitiated due to vague reasons and lack of a live nexus.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the approval for reopening was granted based on vague information and a mechanical exercise of power, lacking a live nexus to the seized material. The notice and approval did not exhibit supporting material linking the seized documents to the escapement of income.
What were the issues?
Whether the approval granted for reopening the assessment under Section 148B was valid, considering the vagueness of reasons and lack of a live nexus between seized material and escapement of income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 143(3),Section 148B,Section 148,Section 149(1)(a),Section 132,Section 292BC
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, DELHI
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:
This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order dated 20.01.2026 of the Ld. CIT(A)-26, Delhi (hereinafter referred as Ld. First
P a g e | 2 Madhubala (AY: 2021-22) Appellate Authority or in short Ld. ‘FAA’) in DIN & Order No: ITBA/APL/S/250/2025-26/1084973272(1) arising out of the assessment order dated 26.03.2025 u/s 147 r.w.s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) passed by the ACIT, CC-16, New Delhi, for AY: 2021-22. 2. Heard and perused the record. At the time of arguments ld. Counsel has argued on the legal issue whereby assesse has challenge
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 640/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 639/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Nohar Yadav, Mandir Hasoud, Teh. Arang vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 1(2), Raipur…ITA 638/RPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Kishorbhai C Bhagtani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward 2(1)(1), RajkotITA 999/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Malhar Nitin Bhuptani, Rajkotq vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1054/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Samir Halder vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026