SATBHAIYA TRACTORS,TIKAMGARH vs. DCIT/ACIT 1(1), GWALIOR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 224/AGR/2026Status: DisposedITAT Agra20 May 2026AY 2017-182 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the lower appellate authority (NFAC) had decided the issue ex parte without proper adjudication on merits. Therefore, to ensure justice and fair play, the case was restored to the NFAC for a fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal was filed with a significant delay of 365 days. The primary issue was the confirmation of an addition of Rs. 2,99,50,000/- on account of cash deposits under Section 68 of the Act.

What were the issues?

Whether the addition on account of cash deposits was justified, and whether the lower appellate authority properly adjudicated the issue on merits.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 68,Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH “DB”: AGRA

For Appellant: Shri Dhiraj Ghai, CA
For Respondent: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. DR
Hearing: 19/05/2026Pronounced: 20/05/2026

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AGRA BENCH “DB”: AGRA BEFORE SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 224/AGR/2026 (Assessment Year: 2017-18) Satbhaiya Tractors, Vs. DCIT/ ACIT-1(1), Kile Ka Maidan, Gwalior, MP Gwalior, MP (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AASFS8126R Assessee by : Shri Dhiraj Ghai, CA Revenue by: Shri Anil Kumar, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 19/05/2026 Date of pronouncement 20/05/2026

O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH, A. M.:

1.

The appeal in ITA No. 224/AGR/2026 for AY 2017-18, arises out of the order of the ld National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(A)’, in short] dated 13.01.2025 against the order of assessment passed u/s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) dated 16.12.2019 by the Assessing Officer, DCIT/ ACIT, 1(1), Gwalior (hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. AO’).

2.

At the outset, we find that there is delay in filing the appeal by the assessee before us by 365 days. Considering the reasons adduced in the condonation petition, we hold that the assessee was prevented from sufficient cause for not filing the appeal in time before us. Hence, in the interest of substantial justice, we are inclined to condone the delay and admit the appeal of the assessee for adjudication.

ITA No. 224/AGR/2026 Satbhaiya Tractors

3.

The only issue to be decided in this appeal is as to whether, the ld CIT(A) was justified in confirming the addition made on account of cash deposits of Rs. 2,99,50,000/- u/s 68 of the Act in the facts and circumstances of the instant case.

4.

We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. At the outset we find that on going through the grounds raised by the assessee and the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), we find that the ld NFAC had decided the issue ex parte without adjudicating the issue on merits giving its independent finding. Hence, in the interest of justice and fairplay we deem it fit and appropriate to restore these appeals to file of ld NFAC for de novo adjudication in accordance with law. Needless to mention the assessee be given reasonable opportunity of being heard. The assessee is directed to cooperate with ld NFAC for expeditious disposal of the appeals by not taking unwarranted adjournments. Hence, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 20/05/2026.

-Sd/- -Sd/- (SUNIL KUMAR SINGH) (M. BALAGANESH) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 20/05/2026 A K Keot Copy forwarded to 1. Applicant 2. Respondent 3. CIT Page | 2

More judgments on Section 68

All 29,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 68 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →