BIJAY KUMAR,RANCHI, JHARKHAND vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 3, RANCHI, RANCHI, JHARKHAND
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal directed the addition for stock shortage to be calculated based on the assessee's disclosed GP rate of 21.58%. The additions for demonetized currency and jewellery received for modification were deleted as the assessee provided sufficient evidence.
What were the facts?
During a survey, a stock shortage of Rs. 52,00,154 was found and treated as income by the AO. The assessee also deposited Rs. 40,89,000 of demonetized currency and Rs. 6,87,203 worth of jewellery received for modification was added to income.
What were the issues?
Whether stock shortage, demonetized currency deposits, and jewellery received for modification constitute undisclosed income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI
Before: S/SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY
Per Bench This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi dated 25.6.2024 in Appeal No.CIT(A), Ranchi/10773/2019-20 for the assessment year 2017-18. 2. Shri P.S.Paul, ld AR appeared for the assessee and Shri Kailash V Gautam, ld Sr DR appeared for the revenue.
It was submitted by ld. AR that there was a survey on the premises of the assessee on 17.11.2016. It was the submission that in the course of survey, it was noticed that the Books of Account of the assessee were incomplete. It was the submission that in the course of survey, there was shortage of stock of Rs.
P a g e 1 | 4 Assessment Year : 2017-18
52,00,154/- which has been treated a
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 115BBE
- Vishal Kumar Patel(HUF), Raipur vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), RaipurITA 595/RPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026