INCOME TAX OFFICER, DHANBAD vs. KRISHAN KUMAR UDAIPURIA, DHANBAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the tax effect was below the threshold limit prescribed by the CBDT circular for filing appeals. Therefore, the revenue's appeal was dismissed on grounds of maintainability.
What were the facts?
The revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against the order of the CIT(A). The tax effect in the appeal was Rs. 51,51,001/-. The assessee argued that the appeal was not maintainable due to low tax effect as per a recent CBDT circular.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the maintainability of the revenue's appeal before the ITAT due to a low tax effect, as per the CBDT's monetary limit for appeals.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI
Before: S/SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY
Per Bench This is an appeal filed by the revenue against the order of the ld CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi dated 28.06.2024 in Appeal No. CIT(A), Dhanbad/10144/2017-18 for the assessment year 2013-14. 2. Shri Nitin Pasari, ld AR appeared for the assessee and Shri Kailash V Gautam, ld Sr. DR appeared for the revenue.
At the outset, ld AR of the assessee submitted that the tax effect in this appeal is Rs.51,51,001/- and the appeal of the revenue deserves to be dismissed due to low tax effect in view of the CBDT Circular No. No.09/2024 dated 17.9.2024, whereby the threshold limit for filing of appeals by the Revenue before
P a g e 1 | 3 Assessment Year 2013-14
the ITAT has been fixed at Rs.60 lakhs. It was urged that in c
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026