M/S SALASAR MINERALS,DHANBAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2, DHANBAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer failed to dispose of the assessee's objections as mandated by the Supreme Court in GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. Therefore, the assessment was restored to the Assessing Officer for readjudication after disposing of the objections.
What were the facts?
The assessee objected to the reasons for issuing a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment without disposing of these objections.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessment is valid when the Assessing Officer fails to dispose of objections filed by the assessee against a Section 148 notice before completing the assessment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RATNESH NANDAN SAHAY
PER: BENCH
This is the appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi in Appeal No. CIT(A), Dhanbad/10230/2019-20 dated 02/09/2025 for the A.Y. 2012-13. 2. Shri Vishal Kumar with Shri Mayank Manvenora, ld. A.Rs are represented on behalf of the assessee and Shri Kailash V. Gautam, ld. Sr.DR is represented on behalf of the revenue.
It was submitted by the ld. AR that the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act) was issued on 28/03/2019. The assessee had objected to the reasons recorded vide his reply dated 20/05/2019. It was the submission that without disposing the objections, the Assessing Officer has complete
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026