SHREE SUPRINIT TRADINVEST PVT LTD,AHMEDABAD vs. ITO WARD 4 (1) (3) AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the notices issued under Section 148 of the Act were beyond the 'surviving time' as per the Supreme Court's decisions in Ashish Agrawal and Rajeev Bansal. Consequently, the reopening notices and subsequent reassessment proceedings were quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against reassessment orders for AYs 2015-16, 2016-17, and 2017-18. The primary issue was the validity of the reopening of assessments under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
Whether the reassessment notices issued under Section 148 were validly issued within the prescribed time limits, considering the extensions provided by the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “D” BENCH
Before: Shri T. R. Senthil Kumar & Shri. Narendra Prasad Sinha
आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि / Copy of Order Forwarded to:- 1. Assessee 2. Revenue 3. Concerned CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT, Ahmedabad 6. Guard file. By order/आदेश से, उि/सहायक िंजीकार आयकर अिीिीय अतिकरण, अहमदाबाद
10 ITA No: 1935, 1936 and 1937/Ahd/2025 Assessment Year: 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18
Strengthened preparation & delivery of orders in the ITAT 1) Date of dictation 15/04/2026 2) Date on which the typed draft is placed before the Dictating 16/04/2026 Member & Other Member 3) Date on which the approved draft comes to the Sr. P.S./P.S. /04/2026 4) Date on which the fair order is placed before the Dictating 22 /04/2026 Member for pronouncement 5) Date on which the fair order comes back to the Sr. P.S./P.S. /04/2026 6) Date on which the file goes to the Bench Clerk /04/2026 7) Date on which the file goes the Head Clerk 8) Date on which the file goes to the Assistant Registrar for signature on the order 9) Date of Dispatch of the order
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026