SHREE SHREE ISWAR SATYANARAYANJEE & OTHER DEITIES,HOWRAH vs. ITO, NFAC, , DELHI
What were the facts?
The assessee sold an immovable property for ₹1,17,40,000 and invested a portion of the sale proceeds in Fixed Deposits (FDs). The Assessing Officer (AO) treated the entire sale consideration as short-term capital gain and added ₹67,68,102 to the assessee's income, disallowing the investment in FDs as per Section 11(1A). The CIT(A) upheld the AO's order.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that investment in Fixed Deposits (FDs) qualifies as an investment in a capital asset under Section 11(1A) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal relied on various High Court decisions and a CBDT circular which acknowledge bank deposits as capital assets.
What were the issues?
Whether investment in Fixed Deposits (FDs) made from sale proceeds of a capital asset qualifies as acquisition of another capital asset under Section 11(1A) of the Income-tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 11(1A),Section 2(iii)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, KOLKATA
Per Rajesh Kumar, AM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 14.11.2025 for the AY 2022-23. 2. The only issue raised by the assessee in the various grounds of appeal is against the order of ld. CIT (A) confirming the addition of ₹67,68,102/- as made by the ld. AO on the ground that the assessee has taxable capital gain which were not invested in Shree Shree Iswar Satyanarayanjee & Other Deities; A.Y. 2022-23 consonance with the provision of Section 11(1A) of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (the Act).
The facts in brief are that the assessee filed the retu
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11(1A)
- Shree Harikrushna Velfare Trust, Bhachau vs The ITO Exemption Ward 1, Rjakot, RajkotITA 677/RJT/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Lrg Naidu Educational and Charitable Trust… vs CIT Exemptions, ChennaiITA 2768/CHNY/2026[-]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026
- Valliappa Foundation, Salem vs CIT(E), ChennaiITA 2260/CHNY/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2026-27
- Valliappa Foundation, Salem vs CIT(E), ChennaiITA 2259/CHNY/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2026-27
- The Somaiya Trust, Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward 2(4)…ITA 4057/MUM/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Debashis Dutta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Venky Re Rolling Private Limited vs. State Of Bihar Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Bihar PatnaPatna · 6 Oct 2026
- Sakti Pada Ghosh vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax Midnapore Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Fakhruddin Husainibhai @ Fakhruddin Hasainbhai vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026