ALI ASGAR BAG WALA,INDORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, INDORE, INDORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT restored the matter to the file of the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the principle of natural justice. The assessee was directed to ensure proper participation in the proceedings before the CIT(A).
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT after the CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order. The assessee's representative explained that the assessee could not appear before the CIT(A) due to personal circumstances, including business closure and a family medical emergency.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to present their case before the CIT(A) after failing to appear due to unavoidable circumstances.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI B.M. BIYANI & SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI
आदेश/ O R D E R
Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.:
Feeling aggrieved by the order of first-appeal dated 09.10.2025 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-3, Bhopal [“Ld. CIT(A)”], which in turn arises out of the assessment-order dated 22.04.2021 passed by learned ACIT, Central Circle-3, Indore [“Ld. AO”] u/s 143(3) of Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] for Assessment-Year [“AY”] 2018-19, the assessee has filed this appeal on the grounds mentioned in Appeal Memo (Form No. 36).
We have heard learned Representatives of both sides and carefully
considered their submissions and the orders of lower authorities.
The Ld. AR for assessee has filed following Synopsis giving the facts
and background of case; the reasons for non-appearance before Ld. CIT(A);
and the prayer for restoration to CIT(A):
The Ld. AR also reiterated the contents of above Synopsis orally as
well and requested that the assessee was not able to make representation
before Ld. CIT(A) due to forced circumstances. He specifically narrated that
the business of assessee stands closed as of now and brother of assessee is
also in the state of coma. He submitted that the assessee is having, in his
possession, all relevant details and documents and ready to make an
effective representation before Ld. CIT(A). He prayed that in the interest of
justice, one more opportunity be given to assessee by way of restoring this
matter at the level of Ld. CIT(A) for a de novo adjudication. He acknowledged
that the assessee shall definitely make a proper and effective representation
before Ld. CIT(A).
Ld. DR for revenue, though not opposing the prayer of the assessee for
restoration, submitted that the assessee had remained non-compliant
during the proceedings of first-appeal, which constrained the Ld. CIT(A) to pass ex-parte order. It was, therefore, submitted that while restoring the
matter, appropriate directions may be issued to ensure strict compliance by
the assessee.
In view of above submissions of parties; having regard to the principle
of natural justice and also bearing in mind that no prejudice would be
caused to revenue if the present matter is restored at the level of Ld. CIT(A),
we restore this matter to the file of Ld. CIT(A) for adjudication afresh, at the
risk and responsibility of assessee. The Ld. CIT(A) shall give necessary
opportunity of hearing to assessee and pass an appropriate order
uninfluenced by his earlier order. The assessee is also directed to remain
vigilant and ensure participation in the hearings as may be fixed by Ld.
CIT(A) without seeking unnecessary adjournments failing which the Ld.
CIT(A) shall be at liberty to proceed in accordance with law. Ordered
accordingly.
Resultantly, this appeal is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in open court on 27/04/2026
Sd/- Sd/-
(PARESH M. JOSHI) (B.M. BIYANI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Indore िदनांक/Dated : 27/04/2026 Patel/Sr. PS Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File By order UE COPYSr. Private Secretry Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Indore Bench, Indore
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026