AAKAR CHARITABLE TRUST,MUMBAI vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), CUMBALLA HILLS

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3965/MUM/2026Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 April 20264 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's submission that the trust deed was furnished. It held that the assessee deserved another opportunity to explain its objects and activities. Consequently, both applications were restored to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration.

What were the facts?

The assessee, Aakar Charitable Trust, applied for registration under section 12AB and approval under section 80G. The CIT(E) rejected both applications, citing non-furnishing of the trust deed. The assessee contended that the trust deed was provided and offered to furnish further details.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(E) correctly rejected the applications for registration and approval due to non-furnishing of the trust deed, and if the assessee should be granted another opportunity.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AA,Section 12AB,Section 80G(5)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (2 matters)

ITA No. 3965/MUM/2026
ITA No. 3964/Mum/2026

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

1.

These two appeals by the assessee are directed against the separate orders of

ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) [for short “CIT(E)”] both dated

29.03.2026. In ITA No. 3964/Mum/2026, the assessee has challenged the

rejection of application for registration of assessee-trust under section

12AA/12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). In ITA No. 3965/Mum/2026,

the assessee has challenged rejection of application for approval of fund under

section 80G(5) of the Act. Both the appeals are interconnected, therefore with

the consent of both the parties; both the appeals were heard together.

2.

Rival submissions of both the parties have been heard and record perused. The

ld. Authorised Representative (AR) of the assessee submits that assessee is a

charitable Trust /Institution, filed application for registration of Trust under

section 12AA/12AB on 30.09.2025. At the time of filing on-line application for

registration under section 12AB, in Form 10AB, the assessee furnished all

required details including copy of trust deed and other evidence to substantiate

charitable object and the activities. The ld. CIT(E) rejected the application on the

ground that copy of trust deed has not been furnished. Once application under

section 12AA/12AB was rejected another application for registration of fund

under section 80G(5) was also rejected. The ld. A.R. for assessee submits that

though the assessee has filed all required details and evidences at the time of

filing application, yet they are still ready and willing to furnish all requisite details

is so required. The assessee is interested in pursuing the matter on merit and

has good case on merits, if one more opportunity is allowed to the assessee. He

undertakes on behalf of the assessee to be more vigilant in making timely

compliance. The ld CIT(E) may be directed to decide application on merit.

3.

On the other hand, ld. Sr. DR for revenue submits that he has no objection if the

matter is restored back to the file of CIT(E) for consideration of application

afresh in accordance with law.

4.

We have considered the rival submissions of both the parties and have gone

through the orders of lower authorities carefully. On considering the submissions

of ld AR of the assessee and on going through the details furnished before us, we find merit in the submission of ld. A.R. of the assessee that at the time of

filing application for regular registration of assessee trust on 30.09.2025, the

assessee furnished copy of trust deed which is evident from the

acknowledgement of ITBA portal. We further find that in response to show cause

notice dated 17.01.2026, the assessee again furnished required details vide reply

dated 02.02.2026. The ld. CIT(E) rejected the application for registration under

section by taking view that assessee has not furnished copy of instrument of

trust and in absence of such instrument of trust, no satisfaction can be formed

about the object of trust whether object of the trust are charitable in nature and

trust has been created for the benefit of public at large and not for the benefit of

any ascertainable cross section of society. Once, the application of assessee for

registration under section 12AA/12AB was rejected, application for approval of

fund under section 80G(5) was also rejected. Considering the facts and

circumstances of the case that at the time of filing application, the assessee

furnished the copy of trust deed, which has not been considered by ld. CIT(E).

Therefore, in our view the assessee deserves one more opportunity to explain its

object and activities for seeking registration under section 12AB. Hence, matter is

restored back to the file of CIT(E) to re–consider the application for registration

under section 12AB afresh. Needless to direct that before passing the order, the

ld. CIT(E) shall allow fair and reasonable opportunity to the assessee. The

assessee is also directed to furnish all require details and evidence, is so desired by ld CIT(E). In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are

allowed.

5.

In the result, ITA No. 3964/Mum/2026 is allowed for statistical purposes.

ITA No. 3965/Mum/2026

6.

We find that this appeal relates to registration of Trust under section 80G(5) for

approval. Considering the fact that we have already restored the application of

assessee for registration under section 12AB, therefore this application is also

restored to the file of ld. CIT(E) to be considered after passing order in

application under section 12AA/12AB of the Act.

7.

In result, both the appeals of assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

Order was pronounced in the open Court on 27/04/2026.

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- GIRISH AGRAWAL PAWAN SINGH ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER

Mumbai, Dated: 27/04/2026 Biswajit, Sr. PS Copy of the order forwarded to: (1) The Assessee; (2) The Revenue; (3) The PCIT / CIT (Judicial); (4) The DR, ITAT, Nagpur; and (5) Guard file. By Order

Assistant Registrar / DDO ITAT, Mumbai

More judgments on Section 12AA

All 4,243 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AA →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →