M/S NAKODA BUILDSTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED,UDAIPUR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JODHPUR, JODHPUR
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against the CIT(A)'s orders confirming additions made by the AO. These additions pertained to cash payments for land purchase, sale of land, and alleged cash credits/deposits in bank accounts.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the additions made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) were unwarranted and perverse to the facts on record. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had invoked new charges not part of the AO's assessment.
What were the issues?
Whether the additions made on account of cash payments, sale of land, and unexplained cash credits/deposits were justified. Whether the CIT(A) could invoke new charges not raised by the AO.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 40(A)(3),Section 68,Section 153A,Section 143(3),Section 132
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR
Before: DR. MITHA LAL MEENA, HON’BLE & SHRI SUDHIR PAREEK, HON’BLE
PER BENCH: These bunch of appeals filed by assessee against the separate order of the Commissioner Income Tax (Appeals), Jaipur-5 [hereinafter referred to as the CIT (A)] dated 02.12.2024 with respect to Assessment Years 2013-14, 2014- 15, 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18. 2. The appellant has raised following grounds of appeal: “The impugned order u/s 153A rws 143(3) of the I.T. Act, 1961 dated 07.06.2021 as well as the action taken u/s 153A and notices u/s 143(2) or other notices are illegal, bad in law and on the facts of the case for want of juri iction and various Asst. Years: 2013-14 to
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 40(A)(3)
- Kaveeta Satramdas Mandhwani, Ulhasnagar… vs Income Tax Assessing Officer 3(2), Kalyan…ITA 8165/MUM/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed20 Jul 2026AY 2019-20
- M/S Nakoda Buildstructure Private Limited… vs DCIT, Central Circle-1, JodhpurITA 9/JODH/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed28 Apr 2026AY 2014-15
- M/S Nakoda Buildstructure Private Limited… vs DCIT, Central Circle-1, JodhpurITA 8/JODH/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed28 Apr 2026AY 2013-14
- M/S Vinayak Buildcreation Private Limited… vs DCIT, Central Circle-1 Jodhpur, JodhpurITA 7/JODH/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed28 Apr 2026AY 2019-20
- M/S Vinayak Buildcreation Private Limited… vs DCIT, Central Circle-1, JodhpurITA 6/JODH/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed28 Apr 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jitin Batra Proprietor Of M/S. Dreamz Conference And Event Management Group vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 60 & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Saraogi vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Howrah And Kadamtala Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 7 Oct 2026
- Neeraj Massey vs. Assistant CommissionerUttarakhand · 7 Oct 2026
- Padu Paraja vs. The Commnr. Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- The Lead Factory vs. The Assistant Commissoner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 7 Oct 2026