SHRI PANCHPADRA GOUSHALA SAMITI PACHPADRA,BALOTRA vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the rejection of its application for approval under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. During the hearing, the assessee requested to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be allowed to withdraw its appeal against the rejection of 80G approval.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR BEFORE DR. MITHA LAL MEENA, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SUDHIR PAREEK, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 780/Jodh/2025 (Assessment Year – NA) Shri Panchpadra Goushala CIT Exemption, Samiti Jaipur - 302015 C/o CA R.S. Poonia, D-82-B, Shiwad Area, Krishna Marg, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur - 302015 PAN No. ABETS 6828 B Assessee by Shri Rajat Choudhary, Advocate (Virtual) Shri Anil Kumar Bharadwaj, CIT-DR (Virtual) Revenue by Date of Hearing 28.04.2026. Date of Pronouncement 29.04.2026. ORDER DR. MITHA LAL MEENA, A.M.: This appeal by the assessee is filed against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax Exemption, Jaipur dated 08.09.2023 challenging therein rejection of its application for approval u/s 80(G) of Income Tax Act, 1961 of the Act. 2. At the outset, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee stated before the bench that he has been instructed by the assessee to file an application for withdrawal of the appeal in ITA No. 780/Jodh/2025, as the appellant-society applied for fresh application for approval u/s 80G on 11.10.2025 having Acknowledgement No.
2 ITA No. 780/Jodh/2025 Asst. Year: NA 104764870111025 and requested to consider this and allow appellant society to withdraw this present appeal. 3. The Ld. DR has no objection to the request of the assessee for withdrawl of the appeal. 4. Accordingly, the request of the assessee is accepted and as such the instant appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 29/04/2026.
Sd/- Sd/- (SUDHIR PAREEK) (DR. MITHA LAL MEENA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated : 29/04/2026. Nimisha Sr. PS True Copy Copies to : (1) The appellant. (2) The respondent. (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File BY ORDER,
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026