S.G. INFRAPROMOTERS PVT. LTD.,LUCKNOW vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3, LUCKNOW
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee, upon reconsideration, decided not to press the appeal and requested to withdraw it. The Tribunal permitted the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A)/NFAC for AY 2018-19. The grounds raised included issues of jurisdiction, MAT credit disallowance, and violation of natural justice.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal, which was granted by the tribunal. The grounds of appeal related to MAT credit and procedural fairness.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH “A”, LUCKNOW
PER KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT.:
This appeal, by the assessee, is directed against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 22.09.2025, pertaining to the assessment year 2018-19. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: -
“1. Because on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the order of Ld. CIT(A) is bad in law as the Ld. AO passed the order without assuming proper jurisdiction. 2. Because on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the order of Ld. CIT(A) is bad in law as the AO by not allowing MAT Credit of Rs.50,71,273/- by solely relying on incorrect interpretation of Section 115JB(4) and Section 115JAA(1A). 3. Because on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the order of Ld. CIT(A) is bad in law as AO by not allowing MAT Credit of Rs.50,71,273/- even when the provision of filing report in Form 29B is directory in nature and no penal provisions can be imposed by disallowing the MAT Credit. 4. Because on the facts and in the circumstance of the case, the order of Ld. CIT(Appeals) has been passed in absolute violation of the principles of Natural Justice, without providing adequate opportunity of being heard and therefore deserves to be declared a nullity. 5. The appellant craves for leave to add, modify, amend or delete any other and further grounds of appeal with permission.”
ITA No.859/LKW/2025 Page 2 of 3 2. At the very outset, our attention was drawn towards letter dated 21.04.2026 wherein the assessee has requested to withdraw the present appeal. The relevant contents of the letter dated 21.04.2026 is reproduced as under: -
“1. That the above-captioned appeal has been filed by the appellant before this Hon'ble Tribunal against the order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax NFAC pertaining to Assessment Year 2018- 19. 2. That the appellant, upon reconsideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, has decided not to press the present appeal pending before this Hon'ble Tribunal. 3. That the appellant, therefore, seeks permission of this Hon'ble Tribunal to withdraw present appeal and requests that the same may kindly be treated as withdrawn. 4. That the present application is being filed voluntarily and in the interest of justice. PRAYER It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Tribunal may kindly be pleased to permit the appellant to withdraw the present appeal bearing IT A No. 859/LKW/2025 for Assessment Year 2018-19, and pass such order as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. On the other hand, the Ld. DR has not objected to the prayer of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.
Considering the contents of the letter as mentioned above, we permit the assessee to withdraw this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court on 29/04/2026.
Sd/- Sd/- [NIKHIL CHOUDHARY] [KUL BHARAT] ACCOUNTANT MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT DATED: 29/04/2026 Vijay Pal Singh, (Sr. PS)
ITA No.859/LKW/2025 Page 3 of 3 Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. DR 5. Guard file By order //True Copy//
More judgments on Section 115JB
- Azure Knowledge Corporation Private… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2013/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Digjam Limited, Jamnagar vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 349/RJT/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Braithwaite & Co. Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 1(1), KolkataITA 1076/KOL/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026