RAJENDRA NARAYAN BHOSALE,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 8(1), PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3156/PUN/2025Status: DisposedITAT Pune29 April 2026AY 2016-174 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had not dealt with the legal issues raised by the assessee. Therefore, the appeal was remitted back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee failed to file a return of income for AY 2016-17, leading to a best judgment assessment. The CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order after the assessee failed to appear despite multiple opportunities.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex-parte order without considering the assessee's submissions and legal grounds.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 144,Section 144B,Section 148,Section 142(1),Section 54F,Section 251(1)(a),Section 250(6)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “B”, PUNE

Before: DR.MANISH BORAD & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE

For Respondent: Shri Ganesh Budruk
Hearing: 09.04.2026Pronounced: 29.04.2026

PER DR. MANISH BORAD, AM:

The captioned appeal at the instance of assessee directed against the order Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) / National faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) dated 07.10.2025 pertain to A.Y 2015-16 arising out of the assessment order framed u/s 147 r.w.s 144 r.w.s 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”) dated 30.11.2023. 2. When the case called for non-appeared on behalf of the assessee, however perusal of the grounds indicated that assessee is aggrieved with the ex-parte order passed by ld. CIT(A) and also ld. CIT(A) has not 2 Rajendra Narayan Bhosale

dealt with the legal issues raised by the assessee. Considering the facts of the case we deem it appropriate to adjudicate the appeal with the assistance of ld. DR and available with records. Ld. DR vehemently argued and supporting the order of ld. CIT(A).

3.

We have heard the ld. DR and perused the material placed on record. We note that the assessee is an individual did not file the return of income for A.Y 2016-17. Based on the information about tax deducted at source (TDS) on the interest income and transaction of sale of immovable property, notice u/s 148 of the Act validly issued followed by issuance of notice u/s 142(1) of the Act. Assessee failed to file the return of income in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act. The ld. AO passed best judgment assessment order making addition under income from other sources at Rs. 30,371/- and short term capital of Rs. 1,35,36,000 income assesse at Rs. 1,35,66,371/-.

4.

We further observe that the assessee carried the matter before ld. CIT(A) and raised various legal grounds as well as grounds raised on merits stating that assessee is 1/4th owner of the immovable property and also eligible for deduction u/s 54F of the Act. However, the assessee failed to appear before the ld. CIT(A) in spite of being provided eight opportunities. Resultantly ld. CIT(A) on considering the fact that assessment order has been passed u/s 144 of the Act

3 Rajendra Narayan Bhosale

exercised the powers vested u/s 251(1)(a) of the Act and restored the matter back to the file of ld. AO for making afresh assessment.

5.

Before this Tribunal assessee has raised various ground, and specific ground No.1 is raised stating that ld. CIT(A) erred in passing an ex-parte order without taking cognizance of detailed legal submission filed by the assessee. Even though it is not appearing from the records that assessee has filed any submissions before ld. CIT(A), we however taking into consideration the impugned ex-parte order and that ld. CIT(A) has not dealt with the issues raised therein as contemplated u/s 250(6) of the Act, we deem it appropriate to restore all the effective issues raised in the instant appeal in to the file of ld. CIT(A) for necessary adjudication.

6.

In view thereof, without dwelling into merits of the issue, the issues raised in the instant appeal are being remitted to the file of ld. CIT(A). Needless to mention that ld.CIT(A) in the set aside proceedings shall provide reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee and consider the documents/evidences to be filed by the assessee and pass a speaking order as contemplated u/s.250(6) of the Act. Assessee is directed to update email and contact details on the ITBA portal. Assessee is also directed to remain vigilant and not to take adjournment unless otherwise required for reasonable cause, failing which the 4 Rajendra Narayan Bhosale ld.CIT(A) shall be free to proceed in accordance with law. Finding of the Ld.CIT(A) is set aside and effective grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

7.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced on this 29th day of April, 2026. (PAVAN KUMAR GADALE) (MANISH BORAD) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / Pune; िदनांक / Dated : April, 2026. KRK, Sr. PS

आदेश की "ितिलिप अ"ेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ" / The Appellant.

2.

""थ" / The Respondent.

3.

The Pr. CIT concerned. 4. िवभागीय "ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “SMC” ब"च, पुणे / DR, ITAT, “SMC” Bench, Pune. 5. गाड" फ़ाइल / Guard File.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →