NANAJI LAXMAN KONDAWAR,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2(1), NAGPUR, NAGPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the mode of service of notices was unclear and that the assessee's counsel's address should be provided in Form-35. For ends of justice, the assessee is granted another opportunity to contest the merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was dismissed by the NFAC for lack of information. The assessee's counsel claimed no notices were received. Previously, the matter was set aside to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal was rightly dismissed for lack of information due to non-receipt of notices, and whether a fresh opportunity for hearing should be granted.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH :: NAGPUR
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, Delhi, (for short, “CIT(A)”), dated 04/12/2025 passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, “Act”), for the Assessment Year (AY) 2009-10. 2. On hearing both the sides, we find that the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, has dismissed the appeal of the assessee for the lack of information in regard to the grounds raised. Ld. Counsel has submitted that no notices were received. We find that in Form– 35, address of the assessee’s counsel be provided for service of the notice. Further, it transpires that earlier vide ITA no. 11/NAG/2021, order dat
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026