DISHA FOUNDATION,MULUND WEST, MUMBAI vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), MUMBAI, CUMBALLA HILL, MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3216/MUM/2026Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 June 2026AY 2027-285 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(Exemptions) and restored the matter for fresh adjudication. The CIT(Exemptions) was directed to examine the trust's objects, genuineness of activities, and other conditions under section 12AB, considering existing and any new material, and providing an adequate opportunity to the assessee.

What were the facts?

The assessee, Disha Foundation, applied for registration under section 12AB. The CIT(Exemptions) rejected the application, citing non-submission of documents and lack of proper examination of the trust's objects and activities. The assessee contended that all necessary documents were already on record and that provisional registration had been granted previously.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(Exemptions) properly examined the trust's application for registration and whether the rejection was based on sufficient grounds, considering the available documents and previous provisional registration.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12A,Section 12AB,Section 2(15)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI

Before: HON’BLEVIKRAM SINGH YADAV & HON’BLE SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL

For Respondent: Shri Sandeep Lakra CIT DR

आदेश / ORDER PER SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

This appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of Ld. CIT (Exemptions), MUMBAI vide DIN: ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2025- 26/1086836553(1) dated 04-Mar-2026 for the Assessment Year 2027-28.

2.

The Assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:

1) Ground-1 The learned Commissioner of Income 1 The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) erred Tax (Exemptions) erred in rejecting the application for registration u/s.12A(1)(ac)(ii) read with in rejecting the application for registration u/s.12A(1)(ac)(ii) read with in rejecting the application for registration u/s.12A(1)(ac)(ii) read with section 12AB without properly examining the objects and activities of section 12AB without properly examining the objects and activities of section 12AB without properly examining the objects and activities of the Appellant Trust. the Appellant Trust. 2) Ground-2 The learned CIT(E) erred in rejecting the application 2 The learned CIT(E) erred in rejecting the application solely 2 The learned CIT(E) erred in rejecting the application on the ground of alleged non on the ground of alleged non-submission of documents / details, without submission of documents / details, without appreciating that all relevant documents including Trust Deed, appreciating that all relevant documents including Trust Deed, appreciating that all relevant documents including Trust Deed, Registration certificate under the Public Trust Act, Audited Financial Registration certificate under the Public Trust Act, Audited Financial Registration certificate under the Public Trust Act, Audited Financial Statements, Income Statements, Income-tax Returns, Activity reports were already available ports were already available on the record of the Department and had also been uploaded along with on the record of the Department and had also been uploaded along with on the record of the Department and had also been uploaded along with Form 10AB. 3) Ground-3 The learned CIT(E) failed to discharge the statutory duty 3 The learned CIT(E) failed to discharge the statutory duty 3 The learned CIT(E) failed to discharge the statutory duty under section 12AB (1) which mandates verification of Objects of the under section 12AB (1) which mandates verification of Objects of the under section 12AB (1) which mandates verification of Objects of the trust, and Genuineness of its activities. The impugned order was passed and Genuineness of its activities. The impugned order was passed and Genuineness of its activities. The impugned order was passed without any examination of these statutory requirements. without any examination of these statutory requirements. without any examination of these statutory requirements. 4) Ground-4 The learned CIT(E) failed to appreciate that the Appellant 4 The learned CIT(E) failed to appreciate that the Appellant 4 The learned CIT(E) failed to appreciate that the Appellant Trust had already been granted provisional registration under section Trust had already been granted provisional registration under Trust had already been granted provisional registration under 12A vide Form 10AC dated 01 12A vide Form 10AC dated 01-12-2022, valid from A.Y.2022 2022, valid from A.Y.2022-23 to A.Y.2026-27, after due verification of the objects of the Trust. 27, after due verification of the objects of the Trust. 27, after due verification of the objects of the Trust. Accordingly, rejection of the application for regular registration without Accordingly, rejection of the application for regular registration without Accordingly, rejection of the application for regular registration without examining the activities is arbitrary and co examining the activities is arbitrary and contrary to the scheme of ntrary to the scheme of section 12AB. section 12AB. 5) Ground-5 The impugned Order was passed in violation of the principles 5 The impugned Order was passed in violation of the principles 5 The impugned Order was passed in violation of the principles of natural justice as the learned CIT(E) did not grant reasonable of natural justice as the learned CIT(E) did not grant reasonable of natural justice as the learned CIT(E) did not grant reasonable opportunity to clarify the details, and did not consider the material opportunity to clarify the details, and did not consider the material opportunity to clarify the details, and did not consider the material already available on record. Thus the Order is liable to be quashed. available on record. Thus the Order is liable to be quashed. available on record. Thus the Order is liable to be quashed. 6) Ground-6 The learned CIT(E) failed to apply his mind to the material 6 The learned CIT(E) failed to apply his mind to the material 6 The learned CIT(E) failed to apply his mind to the material available on record including the audited accounts and evidence of available on record including the audited accounts and evidence of available on record including the audited accounts and evidence of charitable activities and passed the order in a mechani charitable activities and passed the order in a mechanical manner. cal manner. 7) Ground-7 The learned CIT(E) erred in not appreciating that the objects 7 The learned CIT(E) erred in not appreciating that the objects 7 The learned CIT(E) erred in not appreciating that the objects of the Trust such as education, medical relief, social welfare activities, of the Trust such as education, medical relief, social welfare activities, of the Trust such as education, medical relief, social welfare activities, etc that squarely fall within the definition of charitable purpose under etc that squarely fall within the definition of charitable purpose under etc that squarely fall within the definition of charitable purpose under section 2(15) of the section 2(15) of the Act. 8) Ground-8 The learned CIT(E) failed to appreciate the settled position of 8 The learned CIT(E) failed to appreciate the settled position of 8 The learned CIT(E) failed to appreciate the settled position of law that at the stage of grant of registration the authority is required to law that at the stage of grant of registration the authority is required to law that at the stage of grant of registration the authority is required to examine only the objects, and the genuineness of activities, and not the examine only the objects, and the genuineness of activities, and not the examine only the objects, and the genuineness of activities, and not the application of income in application of income in detail.

9) Ground-9 The impugned order passed under section 12AB rejecting the 9 The impugned order passed under section 12AB rejecting the 9 The impugned order passed under section 12AB rejecting the application for registration is bad in law, arbitrary and contrary to the application for registration is bad in law, arbitrary and contrary to the application for registration is bad in law, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the Act and therefore liable to be set aside. provisions of the Act and therefore liable to be set aside. provisions of the Act and therefore liable to be set aside. 10) Ground-10 The appellant craves leave 10 The appellant craves leave to add, alter, amend OR modify to add, alter, amend OR modify the grounds of appeal at OR before the time of hearing. the grounds of appeal at OR before the time of hearing.

2.

The brief facts of the case are that the assessee trust, namely Disha The brief facts of the case are that the assessee trust, namely Disha The brief facts of the case are that the assessee trust, namely Disha Foundation, filed an application in Form No.10AB on 30.09.2025 under section Foundation, filed an application in Form No.10AB on 30.09.2025 under section Foundation, filed an application in Form No.10AB on 30.09.2025 under section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) seeking renewal of registration under section 12AB of the eking renewal of registration under section 12AB of the eking renewal of registration under section 12AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”). During the course of proceedings, the tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”). During the course of proceedings, the tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”). During the course of proceedings, the CIT(Exemptions) observed that the application filed by the assessee was CIT(Exemptions) observed that the application filed by the assessee was CIT(Exemptions) observed that the application filed by the assessee was incomplete and all the documents required under Rule 17A incomplete and all the documents required under Rule 17A(2) had not been (2) had not been furnished. Accordingly, CIT(Exemptions) issued a notice dated 24.01.2026 furnished. Accordingly, CIT(Exemptions) issued a notice dated 24.01.2026 furnished. Accordingly, CIT(Exemptions) issued a notice dated 24.01.2026 asking the assessee to furnish the complete set of documents and other details. asking the assessee to furnish the complete set of documents and other details. asking the assessee to furnish the complete set of documents and other details. According to the CIT(Exemptions), the assessee failed to comply with the terms According to the CIT(Exemptions), the assessee failed to comply with the terms According to the CIT(Exemptions), the assessee failed to comply with the terms of the notice. The CIT(Exemptions) observed that registration under section notice. The CIT(Exemptions) observed that registration under section notice. The CIT(Exemptions) observed that registration under section 12AB of the Act could be granted only after satisfying himself regarding the 12AB of the Act could be granted only after satisfying himself regarding the 12AB of the Act could be granted only after satisfying himself regarding the objects of the trust, the genuineness of its activities and compliance with other objects of the trust, the genuineness of its activities and compliance with other objects of the trust, the genuineness of its activities and compliance with other laws for achieving its objec laws for achieving its objects. Since, according to the CIT(Exemptions), ts. Since, according to the CIT(Exemptions), necessary compliance was not made by the assessee, he was unable to arrive at a necessary compliance was not made by the assessee, he was unable to arrive at a necessary compliance was not made by the assessee, he was unable to arrive at a conclusion on these aspects and, therefore, rejected the application for renewal conclusion on these aspects and, therefore, rejected the application for renewal conclusion on these aspects and, therefore, rejected the application for renewal of registration under section 12AB of the Act of registration under section 12AB of the Act, vide order dated 04.03.2026. de order dated 04.03.2026.

3.

The assessee is in appeal before us against the order passed by the The assessee is in appeal before us against the order passed by the The assessee is in appeal before us against the order passed by the CIT(Exemptions) rejecting the application of the assessee. CIT(Exemptions) rejecting the application of the assessee.

4.

Before us, the learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the Before us, the learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the Before us, the learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the CIT(Exemptions) erred in r CIT(Exemptions) erred in rejecting the application without examining the ejecting the application without examining the objects of the trust and the genuineness of its activities as mandated under objects of the trust and the genuineness of its activities as mandated under objects of the trust and the genuineness of its activities as mandated under section 12AB of the Act. It was submitted that all relevant documents, including section 12AB of the Act. It was submitted that all relevant documents, including section 12AB of the Act. It was submitted that all relevant documents, including the Trust Deed, registration certificate under the the Trust Deed, registration certificate under the Public Trust Act, audited Public Trust Act, audited financial statements, income financial statements, income-tax returns and activity reports, were already tax returns and activity reports, were already available on the record of the Department and had also been uploaded along available on the record of the Department and had also been uploaded along available on the record of the Department and had also been uploaded along with Form No.10AB. The learned counsel further submitted that the assessee with Form No.10AB. The learned counsel further submitted that the assessee with Form No.10AB. The learned counsel further submitted that the assessee had already been granted provisional registration under section 12AB vide Form already been granted provisional registration under section 12AB vide Form already been granted provisional registration under section 12AB vide Form No.10AC dated 01.12.2022 valid from Assessment Year 2022 No.10AC dated 01.12.2022 valid from Assessment Year 2022-23 to Assessment 23 to Assessment Year 2026-27 after due verification of its objects and, therefore, rejection of the 27 after due verification of its objects and, therefore, rejection of the 27 after due verification of its objects and, therefore, rejection of the application for regular registration without examining the charitable activities registration without examining the charitable activities registration without examining the charitable activities was contrary to the scheme of section 12AB of the Act. According to the learned was contrary to the scheme of section 12AB of the Act. According to the learned was contrary to the scheme of section 12AB of the Act. According to the learned counsel, the order was passed in a mechanical manner without considering the counsel, the order was passed in a mechanical manner without considering the counsel, the order was passed in a mechanical manner without considering the material already available on record and material already available on record and without granting adequate opportunity without granting adequate opportunity to clarify the details sought. to clarify the details sought.

5.

We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material available We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material available We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material available on record.

6.

We find that the application of the assessee seeking regular registration We find that the application of the assessee seeking regular registration We find that the application of the assessee seeking regular registration under section 12AB was rejected primarily on the ground of non s rejected primarily on the ground of non-compliance s rejected primarily on the ground of non with the notice issued by the CIT(Exemptions). However, the specific with the notice issued by the CIT(Exemptions). However, the specific with the notice issued by the CIT(Exemptions). However, the specific contention raised before us is that the relevant documents such as the Trust contention raised before us is that the relevant documents such as the Trust contention raised before us is that the relevant documents such as the Trust Deed, audited financial statements, income Deed, audited financial statements, income-tax returns and activity reports were d activity reports were already available on record and had also been uploaded along with Form already available on record and had also been uploaded along with Form already available on record and had also been uploaded along with Form No.10AB. The Counsel for the assessee has further contended that provisional No.10AB. The Counsel for the assessee has further contended that provisional No.10AB. The Counsel for the assessee has further contended that provisional registration had already been granted under section 12AB vide Form No.10AC registration had already been granted under section 12AB vide Form No.10AC registration had already been granted under section 12AB vide Form No.10AC and that the objects of the trust had already undergone verification. the objects of the trust had already undergone verification. the objects of the trust had already undergone verification.

6.

Considering the entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and in the Considering the entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and in the Considering the entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of substantial justice, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order interest of substantial justice, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order interest of substantial justice, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order passed by the CIT(Exemptions) and restore the matter to his file for de novo passed by the CIT(Exemptions) and restore the matter to his file for de novo passed by the CIT(Exemptions) and restore the matter to his file for de novo adjudication. The CIT(Exemptions) shall examine the objects of the trust, the xemptions) shall examine the objects of the trust, the xemptions) shall examine the objects of the trust, the genuineness of its activities and other conditions prescribed under section 12AB genuineness of its activities and other conditions prescribed under section 12AB genuineness of its activities and other conditions prescribed under section 12AB after taking into consideration the documents already available on record as well after taking into consideration the documents already available on record as well after taking into consideration the documents already available on record as well as such additional material as may be as such additional material as may be furnished by the assessee. Needless to furnished by the assessee. Needless to state, adequate opportunity of being heard shall be afforded to the assessee. state, adequate opportunity of being heard shall be afforded to the assessee. state, adequate opportunity of being heard shall be afforded to the assessee. Since we are restoring the matter for fresh adjudication, we refrain from Since we are restoring the matter for fresh adjudication, we refrain from Since we are restoring the matter for fresh adjudication, we refrain from expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim and all issues expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim and all issues are left open for are left open for consideration by the CIT(Exemptions) in accordance with law. consideration by the CIT(Exemptions) in accordance with law.

7.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in Open Order pronounced in Open Court on 22.06.2016

Sd/- Sd/- - VIKRAM SINGH YADAV VIKRAM SINGH YADAV SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER MEMBER Mumbai Dated: 22.06.2026

More judgments on Section 12A

All 6,064 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →