PLANTS PLANET,NAVI MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NAVI MUMBAI
What were the facts?
The assessee firm treated income from nursery activities as agricultural income, claiming exemption under Section 10(1). The lower authorities treated this income as business income. The assessee argued that Explanation 3 to Section 2(1A) specifically deems income from saplings/seedlings grown in a nursery as agricultural income.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the lower authorities relied on insufficient evidence and the assessee also failed to produce supporting material. Therefore, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.
What were the issues?
Whether income derived from nursery activities, specifically from saplings and seedlings, qualifies as agricultural income under Section 2(1A) read with Explanation 3 and is thus exempt under Section 10(1).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “J (SMC
Before: SHRI OM PRAKASH KANT & SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE
PER OM PRAKASH KANT, AM
This appeal by the Assessee firm is directed against order dated 31.12.2025, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income- tax (Appeals) – National Faceless Appeal Centers- Delhi (in short, “the Ld. CIT(A)”), for the Assessment Year 2017–18, raising following grounds:
“1. Ground No. 1 Erroneous confirmation of addition treating agricultural income as business income
Plants Planet 2
The learned Commissioner of Income
The learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), NFAC, erred in law tax (Appeals), NFAC, erred in law and on facts in confirming t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(1)
- Prafulldan Motising Gadhvi, Ahmedabad vs ITO Ward 4(2)(1) Ahmedabad, Pratyaksha Kar…ITA 2589/AHD/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Pramod Dwivedi, Raipur vs ITO, Ward-1(2), RaipurITA 597/RPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sukhveer Singh Dhilow, Ashoknagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ashok NagarITA 373/AGR/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Yeddula Venkata Narayana Reddy, Bellary vs ITO, Ward1 & Tps, HospetITA 415/BANG/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Kalpana Devi, Godda vs Income Tax Officer ITO W3(1), DeogharITA 72/RAN/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Bisleri International PVT.LTD, Mumbai vs. Principal Commissioner, Central Revenue Building, BhubaneswarOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Saraswat Infra And Projects, Sundergarh vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Kamalakanta Nayak vs. The State Tax Officer, Mayurbhanj Circle,BalasoreOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Vedvyas Logistics Private Limited, Sundargarh vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Harilal Agarwalla vs. State Tax Officer, Kendrapara CircleOrissa · 7 Oct 2026