ACIT CIRCLE-1(1)(1), VADODARA vs. LINDE ENGINEERING INDIA PVT LTD, VADODARA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the jurisdiction to entertain the appeal lies with the Delhi Benches of the Tribunal, not the Ahmedabad Benches. Therefore, the appeal and cross-objection were dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal and the Assessee filed a cross-objection against an order of the CIT(A). The assessment order was passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-4(1), New Delhi.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the correct jurisdiction of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to hear the appeal, given the location where the assessment order was passed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Per Rahul Chaudhary, Judicial Member:
The present appeal preferred by the Revenue and the Cross Objection filed by the Assessee arise from the Order, dated 04/08/2025, passed Assessment Year 2010-2011 by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal, Ahmedabad-13 [hereinafter referred to as the ‘CIT(A)’] whereby Learned CIT(A) had allowed the appeal against the Assessment Order, dated 25/04/2014, passed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’],for the Assessment year 2010-2011. 2. During the course of hearing it become apparent that the relevant Assessment Order dated 25/04/2014 has been passed by Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-4(1), New Delhi. Both the sides agreed that as per the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Principal commissioner of Income Tax Vs ABC Papers Ltd.: [2022] 447 ITR 1 (SC)[18/08/2022] the juri iction to entertain/adjudicate the appeal lies with Delhi Benches of the Tribunal. Accordingly, the present appeal and cross-objection are dismissed with liberty granted to the parties to file appeal/cross-objection before the Delhi Benches of the Tribunal along with application seeking condonation of delay placing on record the correct facts pertaining to the inadvertent filing of the present appeal.
In result, in term of paragraph 2 above, the present appeal and cross- objections are dismissed.
Order is pronounced on 18.06.2026 (Dr. B.R.R. Kumar) Judicial Member
िदनांकDated :18.06.2026 अहमदाबाद Ahmedabad;H.C. PS Assessment Year 2010-2011
आदेशक""ितिलिपअ"ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ"/ The Appellant
""यथ"/ The Respondent. 3. संबंिधतआयकरआयु"/ Concerned CIT 4. आयकरआयु"(अपील) / The CIT(A) 5. िवभागीय"ितिनिध, आयकरअपीलीयअिधकरण/ DR, ITAT, 6. गाड"फाईल /Guard file. आदेशानुसार/BY ORDER, उप/सहायकपंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026