MONIKA RAJESH MALANI,PUSAD DIST YAVATMAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, YAVATMAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) after finding the assessee's reasons to be truthful. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, and the issues on merits were restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeals were filed against the orders of the CIT(A) for AY 2022-23. The assessment order was passed ex-parte under Section 144 of the Act. There was a delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) should be condoned. Whether the quantum and penalty proceedings should be restored to the CIT(A) for fresh hearing.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH :: NAGPUR
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI KHETTRA MOHAN ROY
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:
These appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (for short, “CIT(A)”), dated 25/09/2025 & 11/12/2025, passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, “Act”), for the Assessment Year (AY) 2022-23. ITA Nos. 38, 41 & 43/NAG/2026 (Monika Rajesh Malani )
These appeals were heard together as they arrive out of impugned assessment order and consequential penalty proceedings thereof and we find that the assessment order has been passed under Section 144 of the Act. There was a delay in filing of the appeal before Ld. First Appellate Authority for which
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026