SHREE SHYAM MITRA,NAGPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that a mere technical mistake in selecting the section code in Form 10AB should not be considered fatal to deny registration, especially when the assessee otherwise fulfilled all conditions and submitted genuine documents. The rejection was based solely on this clerical error.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable institution, applied for registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The application was rejected by the CIT(E) because the assessee inadvertently selected the wrong section code (12A(1)(ac)(ii) instead of 12A(1)(ac)(vi)(B)) in Form 10AB.
What were the issues?
Whether a clerical error in selecting the section code in an application for registration under Section 12AB can be a valid ground for rejection of the application.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 12AB,Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii),Section 12A(1)(ac)(vi)(B)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH :: NAGPUR
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI KHETTRA MOHAN ROY
PER KHETTRA MOHAN ROY, AM:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune, (for short, “CIT(E)”), dated 30/08/2025; whereby application for grant of regular registration u/s. 12A has been rejected.
Assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
“1. The learned CIT (Exemption), Pune erred in rejecting the application filed for grant of registration u/s 12AB of Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. The order passed by CIT (Exemption), Pune rejecting the application for registration u/s 12AB without considering the compliances made in response to notice issued by e-mail on 23/07/205 is illegal, invalid and bad in law.
The learned CIT (Exemption) ought to have granted registration u/s 12AB of Income Ta
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026