SUSHIL GUPTA,MAINPURI vs. ITO WARD 4(2)4 , MAINPURI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the AO's reliance on a case dealing with imported liquor was distinguishable. Considering the assessee's consistent low profit margins in country liquor trade and similar cases, the Tribunal found the estimated 3% profit to be excessive.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a liquor dealer, filed his return of income. The AO rejected the assessee's books of accounts under Section 145(3) due to lack of proper documentation for expenses and estimated income at 3% on stock. The CIT(A) sustained the addition.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of books of accounts and estimation of income at 3% was justified given the nature of the business and the assessee's past profit trends.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH “DB”, AGRA
Before: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN & SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH
PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, AM :
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(A)] dated 05.01.2026 for the Assessment Year 2022-23. 2. Brief facts of the case are, assessee filed his return of income for the AY 2022-23 on 02.10.2022 declaring total income at Rs.11,04,770/-. The case
2 was selected for complete scrutiny through CASS for the reasons that, "The assessee has disclosed low income from receipts (liquor) on which TCS has been deducted. There is a possibility that assessee has shown low income in order to reduce its profit/t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 145(3)
- M/S. Sarvesh Mercantile Private Limited… vs DCIT Central Circle 2(1), MumbaiITA 1952/MUM/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- M/S. Sarvesh Mercantile Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 1951/MUM/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- M/S. Sarvesh Mercantile Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 1950/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax… vs Pacifica India Projects Private Limited…ITA 2336/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax… vs Pacifica Builders Private Limited, AhmedabadITA 2335/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026