CHANDRASHEKHAR PRASAD SINGH,PATNA, BIHAR vs. ITO WARD 4(1) PATNA , PATNA, BIHAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reassessment notice was issued beyond the period of limitation prescribed under Section 149(1)(b) of the Act, as the escaped income was less than Rs. 50 lakhs. Consequently, the assessment order was quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee did not file a return for AY 2015-16. The AO initiated reassessment proceedings, issuing a notice under Section 148 on April 4, 2022, alleging significant cash deposits and fixed deposits. The assessee eventually filed a return and explained the sources, but the addition under Section 69A was confirmed by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated beyond the prescribed limitation period, particularly concerning the applicability of the extended period for escaped income below Rs. 50 lakhs.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PATNA BENCH, PATNA
PER LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)m, National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “the Ld. CIT(A)] dated 22.09.2025, DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025- 26/1080986226(1) on the following grounds of appeal:
2 Chandrashekhar Prasad Singh “1. Invalidity of Reassessment Proceedings on Account of Limitation That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Learned Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Lear
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026