BHADOHI INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,BHADOHI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION CIRCLE LUCKNOW
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order. The appeal was signed and verified by an individual whose designation varied and was not competent to sign the appeal as per the Income Tax Act and Rules. The assessee was also absent during the hearing.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal was not maintainable because it was signed and verified by an incompetent person. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed without going into the merits of the case or the delay condonation application.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal filed before the ITAT is maintainable if it is not signed and verified by a person competent to do so as per the provisions of the Income Tax Act and Rules.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH ‘B’, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT, VICE- & ANADEE NATH MISSHRA
PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA:A.M. (A) This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the impugned appellate order of learned CIT(A)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 16.08.2023 for the AY 2016-17. (B) In this case, assessment order dated 26.12.2018 was passed under section 143(3) of the Act whereby the assessee’s total income was determined at Rs. 7,31,27,354/-; as against the returned income of Nil. The assessee’s appeal against the assessment order was dismissed by the learned CIT(A) vide impugned appellate order dated 16.08.2023. The present appeal has been filed Assessment Year:2016-17 2
by assessee against the aforesaid impugned appellate or
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 140
- ACIT, New Delhi vs Ravi Construction Pvt Ltd, DelhiITA 4005/DEL/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Sri Sarva Dharma Samanvaya Trust… vs CIT Exemptions, BangaloreITA 2464/BANG/2025[2025-26]Status: Disposed30 Mar 2026AY 2025-26
- Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income…ITA 113/BANG/2024[2015-16]Status: Heard26 Mar 2026AY 2015-16
- Srs It Solutions P.Ltd, New Delhi vs DCIT, Central Circle-II, FaridabadITA 3636/DEL/2018[2008-09]Status: Disposed23 Jan 2026AY 2008-09
- Pradeep Jaiswal, Sonkatch vs ITO 1(2), Ind, IndoreITA 568/IND/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed22 Dec 2025AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smita Chawda vs. Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Sahil vs. M/S Aadharshila Developers PVT LTD.Chhattisgarh · 6 Oct 2026
- Mayank Arc And Electrodes Private Limited & Anr. vs. Assistant Commissioner CGST Laxmi Nagar Division & Ors.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Jogender Proprietor Of M/S J.K. Construction vs. The Joint Commissioner (Appeals-Ii) & Anr.Delhi · 6 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Murugan Tyres vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer-1/ The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 6 Oct 2026